Snus: Difference between revisions
Richardpruen (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(from Google Cache) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:323B3915-10EF-4945-AAA2-3EED42737C04.jpeg|right|thumb|‘Siberia’ Snus]]A Swedish invention, Snus is moist tobacco that is used orally. | |||
* It's mostly portioned into convenient sachets (like teabags). | |||
* Whereas "loose snus" tobacco powder has to be squeezed into spherical/cylindrical shape before use. | |||
* Not chewed, but usually placed behind the upper lip. | |||
* It is available in a range of flavours and strengths to suit any palate / nicotine requirement. | |||
* Can be used for 20-60min usually, or as long as it still emits flavours or until it liquifies too much. | |||
* Often available for around 5 moneys for a tin of 24 (sizing varies). | |||
* Lower dependency profile than cigarettes, because of slower nicotine absorbtion (akin to gums). | |||
* Should be stored in the fridge, if infrequently used. | |||
* Banned in the EU to preserve cancer rates (probably). | |||
=== Studies === | |||
'''2003:''' [https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.12.4.349 Effect of smokeless tobacco (snus) on smoking and public health in Sweden] (J Foulds / L Ramstrom / M Burke / K Fagerström) | |||
"Snus availability in Sweden appears to have contributed to the unusually low rates of smoking among Swedish men by helping them transfer to a notably less harmful form of nicotine dependence." | |||
'''2013''': [https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nts185 Patterns of dual use of snus and cigarettes in a mature snus market] (Karl Erik Lund / Ann McNeill), n=3524 | |||
Dual use is relatively small. Large percentage of users have stopped smoking, or are planning to by using snus. […] | |||
'''2015:''' T[https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntu224 ime to First Use Among Daily Smokers and Smokeless Tobacco Users] (Brad Rodu / Nantaporn Plurphanswat / Karl Fagerström) | |||
"[…] offering some support for the Fagerström-Eissenberg hypothesis that the dependence level of cigarettes is higher than that of ST." (certainly applies to Snus as well) | |||
=== Other references === | |||
* http://www.smokersonly.org/ on smokeless tobacco as quitting option. Mentions an estimate of ST being 98% less harmful than cigarettes. | |||
* https://snusforumet.se/en/snus-science-database/ - Encompassing research list on Snus Forum. | |||
* https://www.snuson.com/ - Consumer forum. | |||
[[Category:THR product]] | [[Category:THR product]] | ||
[[Category:Smoking cessation]] | [[Category:Smoking cessation]] |
Revision as of 18:19, 14 May 2022
A Swedish invention, Snus is moist tobacco that is used orally.
- It's mostly portioned into convenient sachets (like teabags).
- Whereas "loose snus" tobacco powder has to be squeezed into spherical/cylindrical shape before use.
- Not chewed, but usually placed behind the upper lip.
- It is available in a range of flavours and strengths to suit any palate / nicotine requirement.
- Can be used for 20-60min usually, or as long as it still emits flavours or until it liquifies too much.
- Often available for around 5 moneys for a tin of 24 (sizing varies).
- Lower dependency profile than cigarettes, because of slower nicotine absorbtion (akin to gums).
- Should be stored in the fridge, if infrequently used.
- Banned in the EU to preserve cancer rates (probably).
Studies
2003: Effect of smokeless tobacco (snus) on smoking and public health in Sweden (J Foulds / L Ramstrom / M Burke / K Fagerström)
"Snus availability in Sweden appears to have contributed to the unusually low rates of smoking among Swedish men by helping them transfer to a notably less harmful form of nicotine dependence."
2013: Patterns of dual use of snus and cigarettes in a mature snus market (Karl Erik Lund / Ann McNeill), n=3524
Dual use is relatively small. Large percentage of users have stopped smoking, or are planning to by using snus. […]
2015: Time to First Use Among Daily Smokers and Smokeless Tobacco Users (Brad Rodu / Nantaporn Plurphanswat / Karl Fagerström)
"[…] offering some support for the Fagerström-Eissenberg hypothesis that the dependence level of cigarettes is higher than that of ST." (certainly applies to Snus as well)
Other references
- http://www.smokersonly.org/ on smokeless tobacco as quitting option. Mentions an estimate of ST being 98% less harmful than cigarettes.
- https://snusforumet.se/en/snus-science-database/ - Encompassing research list on Snus Forum.
- https://www.snuson.com/ - Consumer forum.