ENDS Taxes: Difference between revisions

(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)

Line 15:

===2023: [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.22485 (Updated) The Effect of E-Cigarette Taxes on Pre-pregnancy and Prenatal Smoking]===

*Using fixed effect regressions, we show that e-cigarette taxes increase pre-pregnancy and prenatal smoking.

===2023: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36565585/ Intended and unintended effects of e-cigarette taxes on youth tobacco use]===

*We find that ENDS taxes reduce youth ENDS consumption, with estimated ENDS tax elasticities of -0.06 to -0.21. However, we estimate sizable positive cigarette cross-tax effects, suggesting economic substitution between cigarettes and ENDS for youth. These substitution effects are particularly large for frequent cigarette smoking. We conclude that the unintended effects of ENDS taxation may considerably undercut or even outweigh any public health gains.

===2022: [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/add.16002 Young Adult Responses to Taxes on Cigarettes and Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems]===

Line 132:

Line 135:

*50 state and Washington DC analysis of smoking, vaping, taxes, MSA funds, and prevention / cessesation funding.

===2021: [https://~~www.~~cdhowe.org/~~sites/default/files~~/~~attachments~~/~~research_papers~~/~~mixed~~/~~Commentary_600~~.pdf The Taxation of Nicotine in Canada: A Harm-Reduction Approach to the Profusion of New Products]===

===2021: [https://cdhowe.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Commmentary_600_0.pdf The Taxation of Nicotine in Canada: A Harm-Reduction Approach to the Profusion of New Products]===

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 ===2023: [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.22485 (Updated) The Effect of E-Cigarette Taxes on Pre-pregnancy and Prenatal Smoking]===
 *Using fixed effect regressions, we show that e-cigarette taxes increase pre-pregnancy and prenatal smoking.
+===2023: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36565585/ Intended and unintended effects of e-cigarette taxes on youth tobacco use]===
+*We find that ENDS taxes reduce youth ENDS consumption, with estimated ENDS tax elasticities of -0.06 to -0.21. However, we estimate sizable positive cigarette cross-tax effects, suggesting economic substitution between cigarettes and ENDS for youth. These substitution effects are particularly large for frequent cigarette smoking. We conclude that the unintended effects of ENDS taxation may considerably undercut or even outweigh any public health gains.
 ===2022: [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/add.16002 Young Adult Responses to Taxes on Cigarettes and Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems]===
@@ Line 132: / Line 135: @@
 *50 state and Washington DC analysis of smoking, vaping, taxes, MSA funds, and prevention / cessesation funding.
-===2021: [https://www.cdhowe.org/sites/default/files/attachments/research_papers/mixed/Commentary_600.pdf The Taxation of Nicotine in Canada: A Harm-Reduction Approach to the Profusion of New Products]=== <!--T:29-->
+===2021: [https://cdhowe.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Commmentary_600_0.pdf The Taxation of Nicotine in Canada: A Harm-Reduction Approach to the Profusion of New Products]=== <!--T:29-->
 <!--T:30-->