Nicotine - Retracted Studies, Papers, and Articles: Difference between revisions

Line 17: Line 17:
===2019: Original: [https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.119.012317 Electronic Cigarette Use and Myocardial Infarction Among Adults in the US Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health]===
===2019: Original: [https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.119.012317 Electronic Cigarette Use and Myocardial Infarction Among Adults in the US Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health]===
*2020: [https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.119.014519 Retraction to: Electronic Cigarette Use and Myocardial Infarction Among Adults in the US Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health]
*2020: [https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.119.014519 Retraction to: Electronic Cigarette Use and Myocardial Infarction Among Adults in the US Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health]
**[https://pubpeer.com/publications/F177153E02CA8B3E7B9E70BC8DB204 PubPeer]
**Media - USA Today: [https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/02/20/nyu-scientists-others-call-taxpayer-funded-ucsf-vaping-study-probe/4805323002/  A study claimed vaping doubles risk for heart attacks. It's been retracted for being 'unreliable']
**Media - USA Today: [https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/02/20/nyu-scientists-others-call-taxpayer-funded-ucsf-vaping-study-probe/4805323002/  A study claimed vaping doubles risk for heart attacks. It's been retracted for being 'unreliable']