Current Impactful Studies: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Alan Beard (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Alan Beard (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S2468-2667%2820%2930145-6 New Lancet Study: vaping is rare among individuals who have never smoked conventional cigarettes.] | [https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S2468-2667%2820%2930145-6 New Lancet Study: vaping is rare among individuals who have never smoked conventional cigarettes.] | ||
[https://twitter.com/Lisa_McNally1/status/1333755923144318979?s=20 see reaction and interpretation of this study via a UK Regional Public Health Director] | |||
Revision as of 17:01, 1 December 2020
These studies will have been recently published in the last few months, and rightly or wrongly receiving media attention. Negative media attention is by its very nature, vastly more common, as 'bad news travels or sells'. Some may be described as junk studies, but we must demonstrate why that is the the case in a Scientific logical manner,not just simply dismiss.
New Lancet Study: vaping is rare among individuals who have never smoked conventional cigarettes. see reaction and interpretation of this study via a UK Regional Public Health Director