Current Impactful Studies: Difference between revisions

Alan Beard (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


These studies will have been recently published in the last few months, and rightly or wrongly receiving media attention. Negative media attention is by its very nature, vastly more common, as 'bad news travels or sells'. Some may be described as junk studies, but we must demonstrate why that is the the case in a Scientific logical manner,not just simply dismiss. Please consult [[E-Cigarette_Research_Forum|E-Cigarette Research Forum]] that may well have examined and assessed a study you may have an interest
These studies will have been recently published in the last few months, and rightly or wrongly receiving media attention. Negative media attention is by its very nature, vastly more common, as 'bad news travels or sells'. Some may be described as junk studies, but we must demonstrate why that is the the case in a Scientific logical manner,not just simply dismiss. Please consult [[E-Cigarette_Research_Forum|E-Cigarette Research Forum]] that may well have examined and assessed a study you may have an interest
[https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/sites/default/files/cancer-stats/full_report/full_report_0.pdf E-cigarettes and Primary Care. ] 2019 - A cross-sectional survey of nurses
and GPs across the UK


[https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.12.10.20243857v1 HEALTH OUTCOMES IN COPD SMOKERS USING HEATED TOBACCO PRODUCTS: A 3-YEAR FOLLOW-UP] < via [[Riccardo_Polosa|Ricardo Polosa]] et al  
[https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.12.10.20243857v1 HEALTH OUTCOMES IN COPD SMOKERS USING HEATED TOBACCO PRODUCTS: A 3-YEAR FOLLOW-UP] < via [[Riccardo_Polosa|Ricardo Polosa]] et al