(Added content) |
(adding content) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
We all need to listen to the people and orgs below, who have put out the call to '''Change The Conversation'''. | We all need to listen to the people and orgs below, who have put out the call to '''Change The Conversation'''. | ||
=Educators= | |||
===2020, Aug 10 - [https://academic.oup.com/ntr/article/23/1/36/5890529 Polarization Within the Field of Tobacco and Nicotine Science and its Potential Impact on Trainees]=== | |||
*Divisive, dominant perspectives on e-cigarettes move the field of nicotine and tobacco science away from scientifically rigorous discourse on this important public health topic, which involves millions of lives at stake. If norms do not change, the polarized climate may pressure trainees to choose or inherit an allegiance towards an uncompromising, one-sided stance. That allegiance can then restrict career development, undermine the credibility of research, and hinder public health progress. There is an urgent need to act to avoid negatively affecting the next generation of nicotine and tobacco research scientists. Though we have suggested some solution-oriented ideas, we are calling for reflection among everyone in the field and particularly among those with influence and power. | |||
*There are important questions that must be addressed, including: (1) as the field continues to conquer a range of research questions on e-cigarettes across a range of disciplines and career levels, how can we work better together toward the shared end goal of eliminating tobacco-related disease and death?; (2) how can scientists who perpetuate polarized viewpoints be incentivized and supported to improve?; (3) to whom can junior scientists turn for help with navigating the polarization in the field?; and (4) how can the academic community avoid contributing to the polarization that seems to pervade the field? | |||
edits