Nicotine therapeutic benefits: Difference between revisions
| Line 326: | Line 326: | ||
*Clinical arthritis was exacerbated by vagotomy and ameliorated by oral nicotine administration. Moreover, oral nicotine inhibited bone degradation and reduced TNFalpha expression in synovial tissue. Both IP-injected nicotine and AR-R17779 ameliorated clinical arthritis and reduced synovial inflammation. This was accompanied by a reduction of TNFalpha levels in both plasma and synovial tissue. The effect of AR-R17779 was more potent compared with that of nicotine and was associated with delayed onset of the disease as well as with protection against joint destruction. | *Clinical arthritis was exacerbated by vagotomy and ameliorated by oral nicotine administration. Moreover, oral nicotine inhibited bone degradation and reduced TNFalpha expression in synovial tissue. Both IP-injected nicotine and AR-R17779 ameliorated clinical arthritis and reduced synovial inflammation. This was accompanied by a reduction of TNFalpha levels in both plasma and synovial tissue. The effect of AR-R17779 was more potent compared with that of nicotine and was associated with delayed onset of the disease as well as with protection against joint destruction. | ||
**Citation: van Maanen MA, Lebre MC, van der Poll T, LaRosa GJ, Elbaum D, Vervoordeldonk MJ, Tak PP. Stimulation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors attenuates collagen-induced arthritis in mice. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Jan;60(1):114-22. doi: 10.1002/art.24177. PMID: 19116908. | **Citation: van Maanen MA, Lebre MC, van der Poll T, LaRosa GJ, Elbaum D, Vervoordeldonk MJ, Tak PP. Stimulation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors attenuates collagen-induced arthritis in mice. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Jan;60(1):114-22. doi: 10.1002/art.24177. PMID: 19116908. | ||
= '''Atopic Dermatitis''' = | |||
=== 2023: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37454697/ Association of Atopic Dermatitis with Substance Use Disorders: A Case-Control Study in the All of Us Research Program.] === | |||
* Joshi TP, Bancroft A, DeLeon D, Garcia D, Kunisetty B, Truong P, Kim SJ. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023 Jul 14:S0190-9622(23)01361-0. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.06.051. Online ahead of print. PMID: 37454697 No abstract available. | |||
* Patients with AD, compared to controls, were more likely to use cannabis (4.4% vs 2.7%, 60 P <0.01), hallucinogens (3.2% vs 1.8%, P <0.01), opioids (3.5% vs 1.3%, P <0.01), and 61 stimulants (2.3% vs 1.5%, P <0.01) and less likely to use e-cigarettes (10.8% vs 15.6%, P <0.01) 62 and regular cigarettes (39.0% vs 56.0%, P <0.01). | |||
* In multivariable analysis adjusted for age, 63 income, insurance type, race, sex, depression, and anxiety, only the associations with cannabis 64 (aOR 1.49, 95% CI 1.24-1.80), e-cigarette (aOR 0.71, 95% CI 0.65-0.77), and regular cigarette 65 use (aOR 0.65, 95% CI 0.63-0.68) persisted (Table I) | |||
= '''Auditory''' = | = '''Auditory''' = | ||
===2021 [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-92588-z Task-dependent effects of nicotine treatment on auditory performance in young-adult and elderly human nonsmokers]=== | ===2021 [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-92588-z Task-dependent effects of nicotine treatment on auditory performance in young-adult and elderly human nonsmokers]=== | ||
*The present study evaluated acute effects of oral nicotine treatment on three auditory tasks in young adult and elderly, healthy, non-smoking individuals. All had normal hearing within the frequency range of the stimuli presented for the three tasks. Compared to pre-treatment performance, nicotine improved frequency discrimination. Compared to placebo, nicotine produced no overall effects on the two frequency related tasks, but significantly improved intensity discrimination, with more improvement obtained for those who had lower baseline performance. The present results support the hypothesis that nicotine enhances auditory processing, but this enhancement is task-dependent. | *The present study evaluated acute effects of oral nicotine treatment on three auditory tasks in young adult and elderly, healthy, non-smoking individuals. All had normal hearing within the frequency range of the stimuli presented for the three tasks. Compared to pre-treatment performance, nicotine improved frequency discrimination. Compared to placebo, nicotine produced no overall effects on the two frequency related tasks, but significantly improved intensity discrimination, with more improvement obtained for those who had lower baseline performance. The present results support the hypothesis that nicotine enhances auditory processing, but this enhancement is task-dependent. | ||