ENDS Toxicity / Carcinogenic: Difference between revisions

Line 263:

*Mainstream cigarette smoke HPHCs (∼3000 μg/puff) were 1500 times higher than e-cigarette HPHCs.

*No significant contribution of tested HPHC classes was found for the e-cigarettes.

*[https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.10.010 PDF Version]

*Citation: Tayyarah, R., & Long, G. A. (2014). Comparison of select analytes in aerosol from e-cigarettes with smoke from conventional cigarettes and with ambient air. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 70(3), 704–710. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.10.010

*Acknowledgements: The company for which the study authors work and the companies that manufacture the e-cigarettes tested for this study are owned by the same parent company (Lorillard Tobacco Company)

===2014 [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4110871/ Safety evaluation and risk assessment of electronic cigarettes as tobacco cigarette substitutes: a systematic review]===

@@ Line 263: / Line 263: @@
 <!--T:52-->
+*Mainstream cigarette smoke HPHCs (∼3000 μg/puff) were 1500 times higher than e-cigarette HPHCs.
 *No significant contribution of tested HPHC classes was found for the e-cigarettes.
 *[https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.10.010 PDF Version]
 *Citation: Tayyarah, R., & Long, G. A. (2014). Comparison of select analytes in aerosol from e-cigarettes with smoke from conventional cigarettes and with ambient air. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 70(3), 704–710. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.10.010
-*Acknowledgements: The company for which the study authors work and the companies that manufacture the e-cigarettes tested for this study are owned by the same parent company (Lorillard Tobacco Company)
 ===2014 [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4110871/ Safety evaluation and risk assessment of electronic cigarettes as tobacco cigarette substitutes: a systematic review]=== <!--T:53-->