ENDS Flavors: Difference between revisions

Line 214:

*However, in this paper, we propose an evidence-based version of this model based on several years' worth of longitudinal and econometric research, which suggests that youth e-cigarette use has instead worked to replace a culture of youth smoking. From this analysis, we propose a re-evaluation of current policies surrounding e-cigarette sales so that declines in e-cigarette use will not come at the cost of increasing cigarette use among youth and adults.

**Citation: Siegel M, Katchmar A. Effect of flavored E-cigarette bans in the United States: What does the evidence show? Prev Med. 2022 Dec;165(Pt B):107063. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107063. Epub 2022 Apr 20. PMID: 35452711.

===2022: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9287473/ Impact of existing and potential e-cigarette flavor restrictions on e-cigarette use among young adult e-cigarette users in 6 US metropolitan areas]===

*Results from this study highlight heterogeneity in young adult e-cigarette users’ reactions to existing flavored e-cigarette sales restrictions and hypothetical restrictions. Some reduced e-cigarette use, but many reported intentions to continue e-cigarette use, by using tank-based e-cigarettes, available flavors, or flavors accessed through alternative sources. More concerning, some switched to cigarettes. Similarly, in response to future restrictions of all flavored e-liquids, young adult e-cigarette users largely indicated that they would either quit vaping – the ideal scenario – or switch to cigarettes – the least desirable scenario. Another major concern highlighted was access to flavored e-cigarettes despite restrictions (e.g., online, across state lines). Collectively, findings suggest that implications of flavored e-cigarette sales restrictions are complex, with the potential for both reductions in e-cigarette use and unintended consequences among young adults, including continued use of flavored e-cigarettes or switching to cigarettes, and retail and consumer circumvention of restrictions.

**Citation: Romm KF, Henriksen L, Huang J, Le D, Clausen M, Duan Z, Fuss C, Bennett B, Berg CJ. Impact of existing and potential e-cigarette flavor restrictions on e-cigarette use among young adult e-cigarette users in 6 US metropolitan areas. Prev Med Rep. 2022 Jul 9;28:101901. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101901. PMID: 35855926; PMCID: PMC9287473.

===2022: [https://academic.oup.com/ntr/article/24/9/1332/6550857 The Role of Nicotine and Flavor in the Abuse Potential and Appeal of Electronic Cigarettes for Adult Current and Former Cigarette and Electronic Cigarette Users: A Systematic Review]===

@@ Line 214: / Line 214: @@
 *However, in this paper, we propose an evidence-based version of this model based on several years' worth of longitudinal and econometric research, which suggests that youth e-cigarette use has instead worked to replace a culture of youth smoking. From this analysis, we propose a re-evaluation of current policies surrounding e-cigarette sales so that declines in e-cigarette use will not come at the cost of increasing cigarette use among youth and adults.
 **Citation: Siegel M, Katchmar A. Effect of flavored E-cigarette bans in the United States: What does the evidence show? Prev Med. 2022 Dec;165(Pt B):107063. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107063. Epub 2022 Apr 20. PMID: 35452711.
+===2022: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9287473/ Impact of existing and potential e-cigarette flavor restrictions on e-cigarette use among young adult e-cigarette users in 6 US metropolitan areas]===
+*Results from this study highlight heterogeneity in young adult e-cigarette users’ reactions to existing flavored e-cigarette sales restrictions and hypothetical restrictions. Some reduced e-cigarette use, but many reported intentions to continue e-cigarette use, by using tank-based e-cigarettes, available flavors, or flavors accessed through alternative sources. More concerning, some switched to cigarettes. Similarly, in response to future restrictions of all flavored e-liquids, young adult e-cigarette users largely indicated that they would either quit vaping – the ideal scenario – or switch to cigarettes – the least desirable scenario. Another major concern highlighted was access to flavored e-cigarettes despite restrictions (e.g., online, across state lines). Collectively, findings suggest that implications of flavored e-cigarette sales restrictions are complex, with the potential for both reductions in e-cigarette use and unintended consequences among young adults, including continued use of flavored e-cigarettes or switching to cigarettes, and retail and consumer circumvention of restrictions.
+**Citation: Romm KF, Henriksen L, Huang J, Le D, Clausen M, Duan Z, Fuss C, Bennett B, Berg CJ. Impact of existing and potential e-cigarette flavor restrictions on e-cigarette use among young adult e-cigarette users in 6 US metropolitan areas. Prev Med Rep. 2022 Jul 9;28:101901. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101901. PMID: 35855926; PMCID: PMC9287473.
 ===2022: [https://academic.oup.com/ntr/article/24/9/1332/6550857 The Role of Nicotine and Flavor in the Abuse Potential and Appeal of Electronic Cigarettes for Adult Current and Former Cigarette and Electronic Cigarette Users: A Systematic Review]===