ENDS Adults Who Smoke: Difference between revisions

Adjusting formatting
(Adjusting formatting)
(Adjusting formatting)
Line 17: Line 17:




===2019 [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31278802/ 2019 Perceived relative harm of using e-cigarettes predicts future product switching among US adult cigarette and e-cigarette dual users]===
===2019: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31278802/ 2019 Perceived relative harm of using e-cigarettes predicts future product switching among US adult cigarette and e-cigarette dual users]===
*Compared with those with other perceptions of e‐cigarette harm, dual users who perceived e‐cigarettes as less harmful than cigarettes were more likely to become exclusive e‐cigarette users 1 year later.
*Compared with those with other perceptions of e‐cigarette harm, dual users who perceived e‐cigarettes as less harmful than cigarettes were more likely to become exclusive e‐cigarette users 1 year later.
*[https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/add.14730 PDF Version]
*[https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/add.14730 PDF Version]
   
   


===2019 [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31477072/ Vaping patterns, nicotine dependence and reasons for vaping among American Indian dual users of cigarettes and electronic cigarettes]===
===2019: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31477072/ Vaping patterns, nicotine dependence and reasons for vaping among American Indian dual users of cigarettes and electronic cigarettes]===
*The ten-item Penn State Dependence Index (PSDI) suggested greater dependence on smoking than vaping
*The ten-item Penn State Dependence Index (PSDI) suggested greater dependence on smoking than vaping
*The most common reasons for vaping were to reduce smoking (79%), enjoyment of flavors (78%), and ability to vape where smoking is not allowed (73%). Perceptions of less harm to others (69%) or to self were the next most common (65%). Fewer than half used ECs to reduce stress, for affordability, or because others used them.
*The most common reasons for vaping were to reduce smoking (79%), enjoyment of flavors (78%), and ability to vape where smoking is not allowed (73%). Perceptions of less harm to others (69%) or to self were the next most common (65%). Fewer than half used ECs to reduce stress, for affordability, or because others used them.
Line 30: Line 30:




===2017 [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5800112/ Differences between Dual Users and Switchers Center around Vaping Behavior and Its Experiences Rather than Beliefs and Attitudes]===
===2017: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5800112/ Differences between Dual Users and Switchers Center around Vaping Behavior and Its Experiences Rather than Beliefs and Attitudes]===
*To the extent that dual users substantially lower the number of cigarettes, they will reduce health risks from smoking. However, from a medical point of view, exclusive vaping is preferable to dual use;
*To the extent that dual users substantially lower the number of cigarettes, they will reduce health risks from smoking. However, from a medical point of view, exclusive vaping is preferable to dual use;
*Differences between dual users and switchers center around variables proximal to the vaping behavior and its experienced effects rather than hinging on more general vaping-related beliefs and attitudes.
*Differences between dual users and switchers center around variables proximal to the vaping behavior and its experienced effects rather than hinging on more general vaping-related beliefs and attitudes.
Line 37: Line 37:
*[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5800112/pdf/ijerph-15-00012.pdf PDF Version]
*[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5800112/pdf/ijerph-15-00012.pdf PDF Version]
*Citation: Adriaens K, Van Gucht D, Baeyens F. Differences between Dual Users and Switchers Center around Vaping Behavior and Its Experiences Rather than Beliefs and Attitudes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 23;15(1):12. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15010012. PMID: 29295483; PMCID: PMC5800112.
*Citation: Adriaens K, Van Gucht D, Baeyens F. Differences between Dual Users and Switchers Center around Vaping Behavior and Its Experiences Rather than Beliefs and Attitudes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 23;15(1):12. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15010012. PMID: 29295483; PMCID: PMC5800112.


=Economic Impact=
=Economic Impact=




===2019 [https://progressivepolicy.org/issues/health-care/the-impact-of-electronic-cigarettes-on-cigarette-smoking-by-americans-and-its-health-and-economic-implications/ The Impact of Electronic Cigarettes on Cigarette Smoking By Americans and Its Health and Economic Implications]===
===2019: [https://progressivepolicy.org/issues/health-care/the-impact-of-electronic-cigarettes-on-cigarette-smoking-by-americans-and-its-health-and-economic-implications/ The Impact of Electronic Cigarettes on Cigarette Smoking By Americans and Its Health and Economic Implications]===
*In this study, we examined the growing use of electronic cigarettes and its implications. The wide use of e-cigarettes is a very recent development, and issues regarding their long-term effects and significance cannot be fully analyzed at this time. Using CDC and other data covering the last decade, however, we examined the relationship between the recent sharp increase in e-cigarette use among Americans and the contemporaneous acceleration in the declining rate of cigarette smoking.  
*In this study, we examined the growing use of electronic cigarettes and its implications. The wide use of e-cigarettes is a very recent development, and issues regarding their long-term effects and significance cannot be fully analyzed at this time. Using CDC and other data covering the last decade, however, we examined the relationship between the recent sharp increase in e-cigarette use among Americans and the contemporaneous acceleration in the declining rate of cigarette smoking.  
*We found that the sharp increase in e-cigarette use across many groups can explain as much as 70 percent of the accelerating decline in smoking rates. We also found no reasonable evidential basis for concerns that e-cigarettes are a gateway to cigarette smoking.  
*We found that the sharp increase in e-cigarette use across many groups can explain as much as 70 percent of the accelerating decline in smoking rates. We also found no reasonable evidential basis for concerns that e-cigarettes are a gateway to cigarette smoking.  
Line 136: Line 138:




===2018 [https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=FDA-2017-N-6565-22941 Patterns of flavored e-cigarette use among adults vapers in the United States: an internet survey]===  
===2018: [https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=FDA-2017-N-6565-22941 Patterns of flavored e-cigarette use among adults vapers in the United States: an internet survey]===  
*Survey results submitted to the FDA
*Survey results submitted to the FDA
*In conclusion, this cross-sectional study of a very large sample of adult US e-cigarette users, most of which were former smokers, identified the importance of non-tobacco flavors in e-cigarette use initiation and sustained use, and their contribution to smoking cessation and relapse prevention. *This information should be considered by regulators in order to avoid unintentional adverse effects of over-restrictive regulation on e-cigarette flavors.
*In conclusion, this cross-sectional study of a very large sample of adult US e-cigarette users, most of which were former smokers, identified the importance of non-tobacco flavors in e-cigarette use initiation and sustained use, and their contribution to smoking cessation and relapse prevention. *This information should be considered by regulators in order to avoid unintentional adverse effects of over-restrictive regulation on e-cigarette flavors.
Line 157: Line 159:




===2017 [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5800112/ Differences between Dual Users and Switchers Center around Vaping Behavior and Its Experiences Rather than Beliefs and Attitudes]===
===2017: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5800112/ Differences between Dual Users and Switchers Center around Vaping Behavior and Its Experiences Rather than Beliefs and Attitudes]===
*To the extent that dual users substantially lower the number of cigarettes, they will reduce health risks from smoking. However, from a medical point of view, exclusive vaping is preferable to dual use;
*To the extent that dual users substantially lower the number of cigarettes, they will reduce health risks from smoking. However, from a medical point of view, exclusive vaping is preferable to dual use;
*Differences between dual users and switchers center around variables proximal to the vaping behavior and its experienced effects rather than hinging on more general vaping-related beliefs and attitudes.
*Differences between dual users and switchers center around variables proximal to the vaping behavior and its experienced effects rather than hinging on more general vaping-related beliefs and attitudes.
Line 206: Line 208:
*Citation: Farsalinos, K., Romagna, G., Tsiapras, D., Kyrzopoulos, S., Spyrou, A., & Voudris, V. (2013). Impact of Flavour Variability on Electronic Cigarette Use Experience: An Internet Survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(12), 7272–7282. doi:10.3390/ijerph10127272  
*Citation: Farsalinos, K., Romagna, G., Tsiapras, D., Kyrzopoulos, S., Spyrou, A., & Voudris, V. (2013). Impact of Flavour Variability on Electronic Cigarette Use Experience: An Internet Survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(12), 7272–7282. doi:10.3390/ijerph10127272  
*Acknowledgement: No funding was received for this study.
*Acknowledgement: No funding was received for this study.


=Nicotine Levels=
=Nicotine Levels=
Line 315: Line 319:
*Based on currently available evidence, using current generation e-cigarettes is less harmful than smoking cigarettes, but the health effects of long-term use are not known.  
*Based on currently available evidence, using current generation e-cigarettes is less harmful than smoking cigarettes, but the health effects of long-term use are not known.  
*The ACS has always supported any smoker who is considering quitting, no matter what approach they use; there is nothing more important that they can do for their health. Some smokers, despite firm clinician advice, will not attempt to quit smoking cigarettes and will not use FDA approved cessation medications.  These individuals should be encouraged to switch to the least harmful form of tobacco product possible; switching to the exclusive use of e cigarettes is preferable to continuing to smoke combustible products.
*The ACS has always supported any smoker who is considering quitting, no matter what approach they use; there is nothing more important that they can do for their health. Some smokers, despite firm clinician advice, will not attempt to quit smoking cigarettes and will not use FDA approved cessation medications.  These individuals should be encouraged to switch to the least harmful form of tobacco product possible; switching to the exclusive use of e cigarettes is preferable to continuing to smoke combustible products.
<br>
 
<br>


===2018: [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/add.14527 Discussions between health professionals and smokers about nicotine vaping products: results from the 2016 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey]===
===2018: [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/add.14527 Discussions between health professionals and smokers about nicotine vaping products: results from the 2016 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey]===
Line 362: Line 365:
===2011: Successful smoking cessation with electronic cigarettes in smokers with a documented history of recurring relapses: a case series===  
===2011: Successful smoking cessation with electronic cigarettes in smokers with a documented history of recurring relapses: a case series===  
The most important message from this case series is that these smokers, with a documented history of recurring relapses, were able to quit smoking and to remain abstinent for at least six months after taking up an electronic cigarette.
The most important message from this case series is that these smokers, with a documented history of recurring relapses, were able to quit smoking and to remain abstinent for at least six months after taking up an electronic cigarette.


=Quitting Smoking / Preventing Relapse (No comparison to other methods)=
=Quitting Smoking / Preventing Relapse (No comparison to other methods)=
Line 409: Line 414:




===2019 Electronic Cigarette Use and Cigarette Abstinence Over 2 Years Among U.S. Smokers in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study===  
===2019: Electronic Cigarette Use and Cigarette Abstinence Over 2 Years Among U.S. Smokers in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study===  
In this nationally representative longitudinal cohort study of US adult cigarette smokers, daily e-cigarette use, compared to no e-cigarette use, was associated with a 77% increased odds of prolonged cigarette smoking abstinence over the subsequent 2 years. Regular use of e-cigarettes may help some smokers to stop smoking combustible cigarettes.
In this nationally representative longitudinal cohort study of US adult cigarette smokers, daily e-cigarette use, compared to no e-cigarette use, was associated with a 77% increased odds of prolonged cigarette smoking abstinence over the subsequent 2 years. Regular use of e-cigarettes may help some smokers to stop smoking combustible cigarettes.
Article: Daily e-cigarette use may help smokers quit regular cigarettes  
Article: Daily e-cigarette use may help smokers quit regular cigarettes  




===2019 Article: Adults who vape are more likely to quit cigarettes, study finds===
===2019: Article: Adults who vape are more likely to quit cigarettes, study finds===
“The study did find that the heightened risk of relapse disappeared in those who quit smoking more recently, which the researchers said may be due to improved e-cigarette technology.”
“The study did find that the heightened risk of relapse disappeared in those who quit smoking more recently, which the researchers said may be due to improved e-cigarette technology.”
“For example, the study as a whole considered anybody who quit smoking from 2010 onward and found that, in that sample, vaping increased the risk of relapse. But when researchers only considered people who quit cigarettes as of 2013, former smokers were not more likely to relapse if they vaped.”
“For example, the study as a whole considered anybody who quit smoking from 2010 onward and found that, in that sample, vaping increased the risk of relapse. But when researchers only considered people who quit cigarettes as of 2013, former smokers were not more likely to relapse if they vaped.”
Line 421: Line 426:




===2018 [https://academic.oup.com/ntr/article-abstract/20/8/977/4061315?redirectedFrom=fulltext Advice From Former-Smoking E-Cigarette Users to Current Smokers on How to Use E-Cigarettes as Part of an Attempt to Quit Smoking]===
===2018: [https://academic.oup.com/ntr/article-abstract/20/8/977/4061315?redirectedFrom=fulltext Advice From Former-Smoking E-Cigarette Users to Current Smokers on How to Use E-Cigarettes as Part of an Attempt to Quit Smoking]===
*This study describes the advice that former-smokers who used e-cigarettes to quit smoking would offer to smokers who are considering using an e-cigarette to support an attempt to quit smoking. Vapers advised smokers to find the right combination of device, flavors and nicotine strength, continue to smoke and vape for a while if they wished, not be deterred by past failed attempts to quit smoking, and expect health to improve after they have switched to vaping. Encouraging smokers to interact with vaping peers in vape shops and in online vaping-dedicated discussion forums may help significantly more smokers switch to vaping.
*This study describes the advice that former-smokers who used e-cigarettes to quit smoking would offer to smokers who are considering using an e-cigarette to support an attempt to quit smoking. Vapers advised smokers to find the right combination of device, flavors and nicotine strength, continue to smoke and vape for a while if they wished, not be deterred by past failed attempts to quit smoking, and expect health to improve after they have switched to vaping. Encouraging smokers to interact with vaping peers in vape shops and in online vaping-dedicated discussion forums may help significantly more smokers switch to vaping.
*[https://sci-hub.do/10.1093/ntr/ntx176# PDF Version]
*[https://sci-hub.do/10.1093/ntr/ntx176# PDF Version]
Line 556: Line 561:




===2019 Socioeconomic Disparities in Electronic Cigarette Use and Transitions from Smoking===
===2019: Socioeconomic Disparities in Electronic Cigarette Use and Transitions from Smoking===
Furthermore, more educated smokers are more likely to switch to exclusive e-cigarette use than less educated smokers.  
Furthermore, more educated smokers are more likely to switch to exclusive e-cigarette use than less educated smokers.  
Such differential switching may exacerbate socioeconomic disparities in smoking-related morbidity and mortality, but lower the burden of tobacco-related disease.
Such differential switching may exacerbate socioeconomic disparities in smoking-related morbidity and mortality, but lower the burden of tobacco-related disease.




===2019 [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31477072/ Vaping patterns, nicotine dependence and reasons for vaping among American Indian dual users of cigarettes and electronic cigarettes]===
===2019: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31477072/ Vaping patterns, nicotine dependence and reasons for vaping among American Indian dual users of cigarettes and electronic cigarettes]===
*The ten-item Penn State Dependence Index (PSDI) suggested greater dependence on smoking than vaping
*The ten-item Penn State Dependence Index (PSDI) suggested greater dependence on smoking than vaping
*The most common reasons for vaping were to reduce smoking (79%), enjoyment of flavors (78%), and ability to vape where smoking is not allowed (73%). Perceptions of less harm to others (69%) or to self were the next most common (65%). Fewer than half used ECs to reduce stress, for affordability, or because others used them.
*The most common reasons for vaping were to reduce smoking (79%), enjoyment of flavors (78%), and ability to vape where smoking is not allowed (73%). Perceptions of less harm to others (69%) or to self were the next most common (65%). Fewer than half used ECs to reduce stress, for affordability, or because others used them.
Line 573: Line 578:




===2018 Socioeconomic and Racial/Ethnic Differences in E-Cigarette Uptake Among Cigarette Smokers: Longitudinal Analysis of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study===
===2018: Socioeconomic and Racial/Ethnic Differences in E-Cigarette Uptake Among Cigarette Smokers: Longitudinal Analysis of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study===
Compared with non-Hispanic Whites, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanics were less likely to become exclusive e-cigarette users  
Compared with non-Hispanic Whites, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanics were less likely to become exclusive e-cigarette users  
Low-income smokers were less likely than higher-income smokers to become exclusive e-cigarette users
Low-income smokers were less likely than higher-income smokers to become exclusive e-cigarette users
Line 580: Line 585:




===2016 Racial/Ethnic Differences in Electronic Cigarette Use and Reasons for Use among Current and Former Smokers: Findings from a Community-Based Sample===
===2016: Racial/Ethnic Differences in Electronic Cigarette Use and Reasons for Use among Current and Former Smokers: Findings from a Community-Based Sample===
This study found more similarities than differences among Whites, African Americans/Blacks, and Hispanics with a history of tobacco smoking.
This study found more similarities than differences among Whites, African Americans/Blacks, and Hispanics with a history of tobacco smoking.
African Americans/Blacks were significantly less likely to report ever-use compared to Whites and Hispanics (50% vs. 71% and 71%, respectively; p < 0.001).
African Americans/Blacks were significantly less likely to report ever-use compared to Whites and Hispanics (50% vs. 71% and 71%, respectively; p < 0.001).
Line 629: Line 634:




===2019 [https://www.nber.org/papers/w26126 The Effect of E-Cigarette Taxes on Pre-pregnancy and Prenatal Smoking]===
===2019: [https://www.nber.org/papers/w26126 The Effect of E-Cigarette Taxes on Pre-pregnancy and Prenatal Smoking]===
*We show that e-cigarette taxes increase pre-pregnancy smoking, increase prenatal smoking, and lower smoking cessation during pregnancy. These findings imply that e-cigarettes and traditional cigarettes are substitutes among pregnant women.
*We show that e-cigarette taxes increase pre-pregnancy smoking, increase prenatal smoking, and lower smoking cessation during pregnancy. These findings imply that e-cigarettes and traditional cigarettes are substitutes among pregnant women.
* [https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w26126/revisions/w26126.rev0.pdf PDF Version]
* [https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w26126/revisions/w26126.rev0.pdf PDF Version]
Line 636: Line 641:




===2019 E-cigarettes: Comparing the Possible Risks of Increasing Smoking Initiation with the Potential Benefits of Increasing Smoking Cessation===
===2019: E-cigarettes: Comparing the Possible Risks of Increasing Smoking Initiation with the Potential Benefits of Increasing Smoking Cessation===
Potential life-years gained as a result of vaping-induced smoking cessation are projected to exceed potential life-years lost due to vaping-induced smoking initiation. These results hold over a wide range of plausible parameters
Potential life-years gained as a result of vaping-induced smoking cessation are projected to exceed potential life-years lost due to vaping-induced smoking initiation. These results hold over a wide range of plausible parameters
Our analysis strongly suggests that the upside health benefit associated with e-cigarettes, in terms of their potential to increase adult smoking cessation, exceeds their downside risk to health as a result of their possibly increasing the number of youthful smoking initiators. Public messaging and policy should continue to strive to reduce young people's exposure to all nicotine and tobacco products. But, they should not do so at the expense of limiting such products' potential to help adult smokers to quit.
Our analysis strongly suggests that the upside health benefit associated with e-cigarettes, in terms of their potential to increase adult smoking cessation, exceeds their downside risk to health as a result of their possibly increasing the number of youthful smoking initiators. Public messaging and policy should continue to strive to reduce young people's exposure to all nicotine and tobacco products. But, they should not do so at the expense of limiting such products' potential to help adult smokers to quit.




===2019: Young adult dual combusted cigarette and e-cigarette users’ anticipated responses to hypothetical e-cigarette market restrictions===
===2019: [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10826084.2019.1626435?journalCode=isum20 Young adult dual combusted cigarette and e-cigarette users’ anticipated responses to hypothetical e-cigarette market restrictions]===
“Conclusion: This work provides preliminary evidence that restrictive regulations regarding key EC characteristics may increase intentions to increase CC use among young adult dual EC and CC users.(EC = E-cigarette, CC = Combustible Cigarette)  
*Hypothetical regulations resulted in reported intentions to reduce EC (e-cigarette) use and increase CC (combustible cigarette) use; the greatest impact was found for restrictions regarding e-liquid nicotine content, followed by flavor
*This work provides preliminary evidence that restrictive regulations regarding key EC characteristics may increase intentions to increase CC use among young adult dual EC and CC users.
*[https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/10826084.2019.1626435 PDF Version]
*Citation:: Lauren R. Pacek, Olga Rass, Maggie M. Sweitzer, Jason A. Oliver & F. Joseph McClernon (2019): Young adult dual combusted cigarette and e-cigarette users’ anticipated responses to hypothetical e-cigarette market restrictions, Substance Use & Misuse, DOI:10.1080/10826084.2019.1626435
*Acklnowledgement: This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (K01DA043413, K23DA039294, and K23DA042898). The funding source had no other role other than financial support.
 
 


===2017: [https://academic.oup.com/ntr/article/19/11/1268/3061874 Does the Regulatory Environment for E-Cigarettes Influence the Effectiveness of E-Cigarettes for Smoking Cessation?]===
*This study shows that in a less restrictive EC (E-Cigarette) regulatory environment, use of ECs during a quit attempt facilitates, but in a more restrictive environment it inhibits, short-term sustained abstinence. The findings underscore the need for careful consideration on how best to regulate this emerging product so that EC benefits for smoking cessation are maximized and its risks to public health are minimized.
*[https://watermark.silverchair.com/ntx056.pdf?token=AQECAHi208BE49Ooan9kkhW_Ercy7Dm3ZL_9Cf3qfKAc485ysgAAApowggKWBgkqhkiG9w0BBwagggKHMIICgwIBADCCAnwGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAeBglghkgBZQMEAS4wEQQMXwB9-TJ7vlk7-kAOAgEQgIICTSAdHu4P0JkRyhh3rcZ-5MPXAOE-AKxfh7DVEp9gY8OxmSDo2jGuiPT1649CTOzTcBrsELY4ndWfagmJtzIIZi6yvCMXkTMbs19lls_Ep1rpfYNlH1ibKSH5oBSimq3X-2kueN3g1ccFloNS0PjhW3kCdpv6J5NhtPDLNuYMJv81ryIq-BVgx1PAyMBn1OKQo_5QiHPKryGY9UGO1tNhpeckS0ErlWlgE8sUs9jKQwyY1feQ4pDBeFCc2CFE2xF1QJQy6PpaHUJrEFnt78evuJvkkALtWsAer-nRIaC1agNg3aAyq-_9JUIUkVPtWGVsKJ2k3mQBH7w3jiMvOP4x-btObdaVqTntm7V-vU2SGtobOEArJa3M9Ml0cqGKme788rKsZEYgCD0vcE13-di-bGQyFHxMLJAQme4NYldPovuUb9ZvDtjBzf-OSfRgYel83Ik6rOr12IBsjHgBnyXD1chE0NNLHe1VlGtcZSfF-oyofGuC15ttmeegs8sEaduhXeFR5lkiBpjO8i74ENJe2N3ciEfRCh-ftaWoOEccBsFyuQ2_IAHwpcJzlW5T_TbropWPrzwecCzmlg9NW6ANdcGwXXa_K-tF3KpVZERIfl0NhoJwYNV-YYOcSzBTvCRncK3w7a_f0gfbu_qyTQiJEKjq7vKHb8kQIelfDTYGd5c6hjtG3eSMFCleNxy43Qi86Gx0xVFNldVTU7EJVGdXTszm3pyHA6vfLuBNzYhC6EjIRyyQSh6sAHoKweXTKT_QKlHpFgxjVjdLkXCRtLQ PDF Version]
*Citation: Hua-Hie Yong, PhD, Sara C Hitchman, PhD, K Michael Cummings, PhD, Ron Borland, PhD, Shannon M L Gravely, PhD, Ann McNeill, PhD, Geoffrey T Fong, PhD, Does the Regulatory Environment for E-Cigarettes Influence the Effectiveness of E-Cigarettes for Smoking Cessation?: Longitudinal Findings From the ITC Four Country Survey, Nicotine & Tobacco Research, Volume 19, Issue 11, November 2017, Pages 1268–1276, https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntx056
*Acknowledgement: KMC has received grant funding from Pfizer, Inc. to study the impact of a hospital based tobacco cessation intervention and also has served as an expert witness in litigation filed against the tobacco industry. Ethical Approval: All waves of the study have received ethical approval from the relevant research ethics committee at the Cancer Council Victoria (Australia), Medical University of South Carolina (USA), University of Waterloo (Canada) and the University of Strathclyde (UK).


===2017 Does the Regulatory Environment for E-Cigarettes Influence the Effectiveness of E-Cigarettes for Smoking Cessation?===
This study shows that in a less restrictive EC regulatory environment, use of ECs during a quit attempt facilitates, but in a more restrictive environment, it inhibits, short-term sustained abstinence. The findings underscore the need for careful consideration on how best to regulate this emerging product so that EC benefits for smoking cessation are maximized and its risks to public health are minimized.


===2016: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5079857/ A Framework for Evaluating the Public Health Impact of E-cigarettes and Other Vaporized Nicotine Products]===
*The primary aim of tobacco control policy should therefore be to discourage cigarette use while providing the means for smokers to more easily quit smoking, even if that means switching for some time to VNPs (vaporized nicotine products) rather than quitting all nicotine use. Countries whose policies discourage VNP use run the risk of neutralizing a potentially useful addition to methods of reducing tobacco use.
*[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5079857/pdf/nihms770733.pdf PDF Version]
*Citation: Levy, D. T., Cummings, K. M., Villanti, A. C., Niaura, R., Abrams, D. B., Fong, G. T., & Borland, R. (2016). A framework for evaluating the public health impact of e-cigarettes and other vaporized nicotine products. Addiction, 112(1), 8–17. doi:10.1111/add.13394
*Acknowledgment: Funding was received from the Food and Drug Administration through the National Institute on Drug Abuse under
grant 1R01DA036497-01.
*Article: [https://medicalxpress.com/news/2016-07-health-benefits-e-cigarette-tend-outweigh.html?fbclid=IwAR3ybNxlXyf-4rKoYsEEHpZELUKx6Us1TrkHvRN8JllyDYg8BuRjP2WbQ-s Public health benefits of e-cigarette use tend to outweigh the harms, new study says]
*Article: [https://medicalxpress.com/news/2016-04-tobacco-experts-fda-e-cigs-benefit.html Top tobacco control experts to FDA: Studies of e-cigs suggest more benefit than harm]


===2016: Study: A Framework for Evaluating the Public Health Impact of E-cigarettes and Other Vaporized Nicotine Products===
Article: Public health benefits of e-cigarette use tend to outweigh the harms, new study says -  Article: Top tobacco control experts to FDA: Studies of e-cigs suggest more benefit than harm
Comments: “...The primary aim of tobacco control policy should therefore be to discourage cigarette use while providing the means for smokers to more easily quit smoking, even if that means switching for some time to VNPs (vaporized nicotine products) rather than quitting all nicotine use. Countries whose policies discourage VNP use run the risk of neutralizing a potentially useful addition to methods of reducing tobacco use…”




===2015: Ethical issues raised by a ban on the sale of electronic nicotine devices===
===2015: [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/add.12898 Ethical issues raised by a ban on the sale of electronic nicotine devices]===
Respect for autonomy: prohibiting ENDS infringes on smokers’ autonomy to use a less harmful nicotine product while inconsistently allowing individuals to begin and continue smoking cigarettes.
*Respect for autonomy: prohibiting ENDS infringes on smokers’ autonomy to use a less harmful nicotine product while inconsistently allowing individuals to begin and continue smoking cigarettes.
Non‐maleficence: prohibition is supposed to prevent ENDS recruiting new smokers and discouraging smokers from quitting. It also perpetuates harm by preventing addicted smokers from using a less harmful nicotine product.
*Non‐maleficence: prohibition is supposed to prevent ENDS recruiting new smokers and discouraging smokers from quitting. It also perpetuates harm by preventing addicted smokers from using a less harmful nicotine product.
Beneficence: ENDS could benefit addicted smokers by reducing their health risks if they use them to quit and do not engage in dual use.
*Beneficence: ENDS could benefit addicted smokers by reducing their health risks if they use them to quit and do not engage in dual use.
Distributive justice: lack of access to ENDS disadvantages smokers who want to reduce their health risks. Different national policies create inequalities in the availability of products to smokers internationally.
*Distributive justice: lack of access to ENDS disadvantages smokers who want to reduce their health risks. Different national policies create inequalities in the availability of products to smokers internationally.
*[https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/add.12898 PDF Version]
*Citation: Hall, W., Gartner, C., & Forlini, C. (2015). Ethical issues raised by a ban on the sale of electronic nicotine devices. Addiction, 110(7), 1061–1067. doi:10.1111/add.12898
*Acknowledgement: C.G. is supported by an NHMRC Career Development Award. C.F. is supported by funding from the Australia Research Council for research on the use of stimulant drugs as cognitive enhancers. We would like to thank Sarah Yeates for her assistance in preparing this paper for publication.