(formatting) |
(formatting) |
||
| Line 767: | Line 767: | ||
<!--T:152--> | <!--T:152--> | ||
[[File:Senator_Durbin_Candy.png|Senator Durbin Candy]] | [[File:Senator_Durbin_Candy.png|Senator Durbin Candy]] | ||
===2019: [https://vaportechnology.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Dunham-Economic-Impact-of-Flavor-Ban-11-21-19.pdf The Economic Impact of a Ban on Flavored Vapor Products ]=== | <br> | ||
=Further Reading= | |||
===2020: Policy Paper: [https://241yjo5ffc43s84vz4462arn-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/WHY-VAPE-FLAVORS-MATTER-POLICY-PAPER.pdf Why Vape Flavors Matter]=== | |||
===2020: Policy Blog: [https://reason.org/commentary/montana-should-reject-proposed-ban-on-flavored-vaping-products/ Montana Should Reject Proposed Ban on Flavored Vaping Products]=== | |||
===2020: Policy Blog: [https://reason.org/commentary/how-californias-flavored-tobacco-ban-will-hurt-communities-and-budgets/ How California’s Flavored Tobacco Ban Will Hurt Communities and Budgets]=== | |||
===2020: Policy Blog: [https://reason.org/events/the-costs-and-unintended-consequences-of-tobacco-and-vaping-flavor-bans/ The Costs and Unintended Consequences of Tobacco and Vaping Flavor Bans]=== | |||
===2020: Policy Blog: [https://reason.org/commentary/in-2020-congress-replaced-war-on-marijuana-with-a-war-on-flavored-tobacco-products/ In 2020, Congress Replaced the War on Marijuana With a War on Flavored Tobacco Products]=== | |||
===2020: Policy Blog: [https://reason.org/commentary/cdc-survey-shows-flavors-arent-driving-youth-vaping/ CDC Survey Shows Flavors Aren’t Driving Youth Vaping]=== | |||
===2020: Policy Blog: [https://reason.org/commentary/the-negative-impacts-of-massachusetts-flavored-tobacco-ban/ The Negative Impacts of Massachusetts’ Flavored Tobacco Ban]=== | |||
===2019: Policy Paper: [https://www.heartland.org/_template-assets/documents/Tobacco%20Harm%20Reduction%20pdf.pdf TOBACCO HARM REDUCTION 101: A GUIDEBOOK FOR POLICYMAKERS]=== | |||
===2019: Article: [https://dailygazette.com/2019/07/08/editorial-vote-no-on-flavored-vaping-ban/?fbclid=IwAR1zS8EeRnRi8ItYlqDa68emLywJpHUcccRRT1SOPdZoGROzk7Taea8XkqA EDITORIAL: Vote no on flavored vaping ban]=== | |||
===2019: [https://vaportechnology.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Dunham-Economic-Impact-of-Flavor-Ban-11-21-19.pdf The Economic Impact of a Ban on Flavored Vapor Products ]=== | |||
*[https://vaportechnology.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/New-Economic-Analysis-Demonstrates-Significant-Negative-Impact-of-a-National-Flavor-Ban50808.pdf NEW ECONOMIC ANALYSIS DEMONSTRATES SIGNIFICANT NEGATIVE IMPACT OF A NATIONAL FLAVOR BAN ] | *[https://vaportechnology.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/New-Economic-Analysis-Demonstrates-Significant-Negative-Impact-of-a-National-Flavor-Ban50808.pdf NEW ECONOMIC ANALYSIS DEMONSTRATES SIGNIFICANT NEGATIVE IMPACT OF A NATIONAL FLAVOR BAN ] | ||
===2019: Policy Blog: [https://reason.org/commentary/albanys-proposed-flavored-tobacco-ban-misses-the-mark/ Albany’s Proposed Flavored Tobacco Ban Misses the Mark]=== | |||
===2019: Policy Blog: [https://reason.org/commentary/the-public-health-case-for-e-cigarette-flavors/ The Public Health Case for E-Cigarette Flavors]=== | |||
===2019: Policy Blog: [https://reason.org/wp-content/uploads/michigan-e-cigarette-flavors-explainer.pdf E-Cigarette Flavor Ban Creates Public Health Problems]=== | |||
===2018: Testimony to FDA: [https://reason.org/commentary/comments-on-fdas-advance-notice-of-proposed-rulemaking-on-flavored-tobacco-products/ Comments on FDA's Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Flavored Tobacco Products]=== | |||
===2018: Policy Blog: [https://reason.org/commentary/san-francisco-flavored-vapes-and-the-next-prohibition-disaster/ San Francisco, Flavored Vapes, and the Next Prohibition Disaster]=== | |||
===2018: Policy Blog: [https://reason.org/commentary/californias-plan-to-ban-vaping-flavors-would-hurt-public-health/ California’s Plan to Ban Vaping Flavors would Hurt Public Health]=== | |||
===2017: Blog: [http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2017/05/vape-shop-air-sampling-by-california.html Vape Shop Air Sampling by California State Health Department Suggests that Secondhand Vape Exposure is Minimal]=== | |||
===2017: Blog: [https://www.clivebates.com/flavors Are e-liquid flavours really 'hooking another generation of kids'?]=== | |||
=Suggested Studies, Papers, Surveys, and Articles to Add to This Page= <!--T:153--> | |||
= | *If you prefer to not add information to this page yourself, drop the links here and one of our editors will do it for you | ||
=Page Editor Instructions= <!--T:176--> | =Page Editor Instructions= <!--T:176--> | ||
edits