No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 263: | Line 263: | ||
<!--T:52--> | <!--T:52--> | ||
*Mainstream cigarette smoke HPHCs (∼3000 μg/puff) were 1500 times higher than e-cigarette HPHCs. | |||
*No significant contribution of tested HPHC classes was found for the e-cigarettes. | *No significant contribution of tested HPHC classes was found for the e-cigarettes. | ||
*[https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.10.010 PDF Version] | *[https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.10.010 PDF Version] | ||
*Citation: Tayyarah, R., & Long, G. A. (2014). Comparison of select analytes in aerosol from e-cigarettes with smoke from conventional cigarettes and with ambient air. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 70(3), 704–710. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.10.010 | *Citation: Tayyarah, R., & Long, G. A. (2014). Comparison of select analytes in aerosol from e-cigarettes with smoke from conventional cigarettes and with ambient air. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 70(3), 704–710. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.10.010 | ||
===2014 [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4110871/ Safety evaluation and risk assessment of electronic cigarettes as tobacco cigarette substitutes: a systematic review]=== <!--T:53--> | ===2014 [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4110871/ Safety evaluation and risk assessment of electronic cigarettes as tobacco cigarette substitutes: a systematic review]=== <!--T:53--> | ||
edits