ENDS Youth & Young Adults: Difference between revisions

→‎Youth and Regulations / Preventing Youth Use: 2020 Rescuing Vapers Versus Rescuing Smokers: The Ethics
(→‎Youth and Regulations / Preventing Youth Use: 2020 Rescuing Vapers Versus Rescuing Smokers: The Ethics)
Line 151: Line 151:
*[https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17538068.2020.1860671?needAccess=true PDF Version]
*[https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17538068.2020.1860671?needAccess=true PDF Version]
*Citation: Ziming Xuan & Jasmin N. Choi (2021) Content analysis of the use of fear in the real cost youth e-cigarette prevention campaign, Journal of Communication in Healthcare, DOI: 10.1080/17538068.2020.1860671
*Citation: Ziming Xuan & Jasmin N. Choi (2021) Content analysis of the use of fear in the real cost youth e-cigarette prevention campaign, Journal of Communication in Healthcare, DOI: 10.1080/17538068.2020.1860671
===2020: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7789942/ Rescuing Vapers Versus Rescuing Smokers: The Ethics]===
* For example, what to do if and when certain targeted regulations that would protect teenagers would also, by making it harder to vape, substantially increase smoking in the general population? This situation may be common, and, by pitting the health interests of the general population against those of teenagers, poses an ethical dilemma. This article argues philosophically that if such tradeoffs between the health interests of adolescents and those of the general population exist, morally it is both permissible and preferable to promote the health of the general population.
*[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7789942/pdf/ntaa157.pdf PDF Version]
*Citation: Eyal, Nir. “Rescuing Vapers Versus Rescuing Smokers: The Ethics.” Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco vol. 23,1 (2021): 26-31. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntaa157
*Acknowledgement: The author is grateful to the National Institutes of Health for a grant supplement (to parent grant R01CA190444-04; PI: Delnevo) that supported this work.




Line 171: Line 178:
===2015: Study: How does electronic cigarette access affect adolescent smoking?===   
===2015: Study: How does electronic cigarette access affect adolescent smoking?===   
Abstract: “Understanding electronic cigarettes’ effect on tobacco smoking is a central economic and policy issue. This paper examines the causal impact of e-cigarette access on conventional cigarette use by adolescents. Regression analyses consider how state bans on e-cigarette sales to minors influence smoking rates among 12 to 17 year olds. Such bans yield a statistically significant 0.9 percentage point increase in recent smoking in this age group, relative to states without such bans. Results are robust to multiple specifications as well as several falsification and placebo checks. This effect is both consistent with e-cigarette access reducing smoking among minors, and large: banning electronic cigarette sales to minors counteracts 70 percent of the downward pre-trend in teen cigarette smoking for a given two-year period.”
Abstract: “Understanding electronic cigarettes’ effect on tobacco smoking is a central economic and policy issue. This paper examines the causal impact of e-cigarette access on conventional cigarette use by adolescents. Regression analyses consider how state bans on e-cigarette sales to minors influence smoking rates among 12 to 17 year olds. Such bans yield a statistically significant 0.9 percentage point increase in recent smoking in this age group, relative to states without such bans. Results are robust to multiple specifications as well as several falsification and placebo checks. This effect is both consistent with e-cigarette access reducing smoking among minors, and large: banning electronic cigarette sales to minors counteracts 70 percent of the downward pre-trend in teen cigarette smoking for a given two-year period.”
<br>


=Young Adults=
=Young Adults=