| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
=Post-Publication Criticism= | =Post-Publication Criticism= | ||
*Note: Dates denote when comments were published, not the paper's publication date. | *Note: Dates denote when comments were published, not the paper's publication date. | ||
==Addiction / Dependence== | |||
===2023: RE: [https://pubpeer.com/publications/3BF65B1CBECA15D0EC1068CF8628BC#2 Biochemical Validation of Dependence on JUUL and Other E-Cigarettes Among Youth]=== | |||
*"Readers may be interested to know that there is now a comment to the Pierce et al paper from Shiffman and Hannon. The commenters raise questions about the conclusions drawn by the original authors and report alternative analyses of the same dataset." (Gitchell) | |||
*"To this last point, Pierce and Strong’s response now reports a relevant analysis, and it directly contradicts their assertion in the original paper: they demonstrate that dependence among JUUL users in each age cohort was not different from dependence in users of other ENDS brands (though the trend is evidently for lower dependence among JUUL users)." | |||
*Referring To: John P. Pierce, Eric C. Leas, David R. Strong; Biochemical Validation of Dependence on JUUL and Other E-Cigarettes Among Youth. [https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article-abstract/151/4/e2022059158/190857/Biochemical-Validation-of-Dependence-on-JUUL-and Pediatrics April 2023]; 151 (4): e2022059158. 10.1542/peds.2022-059158 | |||
==Cardiovascular== | ==Cardiovascular== | ||
edits