| Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
*Referring to: Parekh T, Pemmasani S, Desai R. Risk of Stroke With E-Cigarette and Combustible Cigarette Use in Young Adults. Am J Prev Med. 2020 Mar;58(3):446-452. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.10.008. Epub 2020 Jan 7. PMID: 31924460. | *Referring to: Parekh T, Pemmasani S, Desai R. Risk of Stroke With E-Cigarette and Combustible Cigarette Use in Young Adults. Am J Prev Med. 2020 Mar;58(3):446-452. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.10.008. Epub 2020 Jan 7. PMID: 31924460. | ||
===2020-2022: RE: [https://pubpeer.com/publications/E4180AE40B2A0F076D7D07CE0B7961 Association Between Electronic Cigarette Use and Myocardial Infarction]=== | ===2020-2022: Comments RE: [https://pubpeer.com/publications/E4180AE40B2A0F076D7D07CE0B7961 Association Between Electronic Cigarette Use and Myocardial Infarction]=== | ||
*Multiple comments: | *Multiple comments: | ||
**"The study by Alzahrani et al. used data from the National Health Interview Survey, which contains no information about when participants started to smoke or vape, and when they were diagnosed with a myocardial infarction." (Rodu) | **"The study by Alzahrani et al. used data from the National Health Interview Survey, which contains no information about when participants started to smoke or vape, and when they were diagnosed with a myocardial infarction." (Rodu) | ||
| Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
*See also: [https://www.ajpmonline.org/article/S0749-3797(21)00290-7/fulltext 2021] | *See also: [https://www.ajpmonline.org/article/S0749-3797(21)00290-7/fulltext 2021] | ||
**"Alzahrani and colleagues rightly point out that their models test for and thus demonstrate statistically independent effects of smoking and vaping, but if vaping and smoking are not actually independent contributors to identifying MI occurrence—that is, if the association between e-cigarette use and MI occurrence varies as a function of combustible cigarette use—then the main-effects model cannot be used to draw conclusions about the association between e-cigarette use and MI, independent of (or regardless of) one's history of combustible cigarette use." (Critcher, Siegel) | **"Alzahrani and colleagues rightly point out that their models test for and thus demonstrate statistically independent effects of smoking and vaping, but if vaping and smoking are not actually independent contributors to identifying MI occurrence—that is, if the association between e-cigarette use and MI occurrence varies as a function of combustible cigarette use—then the main-effects model cannot be used to draw conclusions about the association between e-cigarette use and MI, independent of (or regardless of) one's history of combustible cigarette use." (Critcher, Siegel) | ||
*See also: [https://sci-hub. | *See also: [https://sci-hub.wf/10.1016/j.amepre.2019.03.012 2019] | ||
**"As the debate on the risks−benefits of electronic-cigarettes continues, a rigorous evidence base is critical. Although determining whether the use of e-cigarettes carries excess risk for future MI is important, it is not possible through the analysis of cross-sectional data, such as the National Health Interview Survey data, from which temporality cannot be inferred. Equally important, we were unable to replicate the authors’ findings. Given the importance of this topic to public health, we request that the authors provide a full and comprehensive explanation for the discrepancies noted and temper their conclusions about “increased risk of myocardial infarction” to reflect the limitations of cross-sectional data." (Bover Manderski, Singh, Delnevo) | **"As the debate on the risks−benefits of electronic-cigarettes continues, a rigorous evidence base is critical. Although determining whether the use of e-cigarettes carries excess risk for future MI is important, it is not possible through the analysis of cross-sectional data, such as the National Health Interview Survey data, from which temporality cannot be inferred. Equally important, we were unable to replicate the authors’ findings. Given the importance of this topic to public health, we request that the authors provide a full and comprehensive explanation for the discrepancies noted and temper their conclusions about “increased risk of myocardial infarction” to reflect the limitations of cross-sectional data." (Bover Manderski, Singh, Delnevo) | ||
* See also: [https://sci-hub.wf/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.06.007 2018] | |||
**"Of concern,however, is the fact that 95% of EC users were also former or current tobacco cigarette (TC) smokers, and the timing of the MI relative to onset of EC use is unknown. (Middlekauff, Gornbein) | |||
*See also: [https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.11.013 2018] | *See also: [https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.11.013 2018] | ||
**"Our findings show the well-established limitations of cross-sectional studies, which cannot justify any claims about causal inference, as mentioned in the conclusion by Alzahrani and colleagues.1 Therefore, the conclusion of their study is incorrect and should be revised." (Farsalinos, Niaura) | **"Our findings show the well-established limitations of cross-sectional studies, which cannot justify any claims about causal inference, as mentioned in the conclusion by Alzahrani and colleagues.1 Therefore, the conclusion of their study is incorrect and should be revised." (Farsalinos, Niaura) | ||
*Referring to: Alzahrani T, Pena I, Temesgen N, Glantz SA. Association Between Electronic Cigarette Use and Myocardial Infarction. Am J Prev Med. 2018 Oct;55(4):455-461. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 Aug 22. Erratum in: Am J Prev Med. 2019 Oct;57(4):579-584. PMID: 30166079; PMCID: PMC6208321. | *Referring to: Alzahrani T, Pena I, Temesgen N, Glantz SA. [http://Association%20Between%20Electronic%20Cigarette%20Use%20and%20Myocardial%20Infarction Association Between Electronic Cigarette Use and Myocardial Infarction]. Am J Prev Med. 2018 Oct;55(4):455-461. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 Aug 22. Erratum in: Am J Prev Med. 2019 Oct;57(4):579-584. PMID: 30166079; PMCID: PMC6208321. | ||
==Cessation== | ==Cessation== | ||
edits