|
|
Line 18: |
Line 18: |
| *2020: [https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.119.014519 Retraction to: Electronic Cigarette Use and Myocardial Infarction Among Adults in the US Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health] | | *2020: [https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.119.014519 Retraction to: Electronic Cigarette Use and Myocardial Infarction Among Adults in the US Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health] |
| **Media - USA Today: [https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/02/20/nyu-scientists-others-call-taxpayer-funded-ucsf-vaping-study-probe/4805323002/ A study claimed vaping doubles risk for heart attacks. It's been retracted for being 'unreliable'] | | **Media - USA Today: [https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/02/20/nyu-scientists-others-call-taxpayer-funded-ucsf-vaping-study-probe/4805323002/ A study claimed vaping doubles risk for heart attacks. It's been retracted for being 'unreliable'] |
| | |
| | =How Mistakes Can Happen= |
| | |
| | ===2022: [https://reason.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Rodu-Plurphanswat-CrossSec-Studies-IAEM-2022.pdf Cross‑sectional e‑cigarette studies are unreliable without timing of exposure and disease diagnosis]=== |
| | *"Studies based on cross-sectional data with no information on age of e-cigarette initiation and age of diagnosis invariably overestimate associations by including cases that were diagnosed before e-cigarette exposure. Although the authors of those studies did not make causal claims in the reports, university media releases and subsequent media articles invariably misled the public to believe that e-cigarette use increases risk for diseases." |
| | *Rodu B, Plurphanswat N. Cross-sectional e-cigarette studies are unreliable without timing of exposure and disease diagnosis. Intern Emerg Med. 2023 Jan;18(1):319-323. doi: 10.1007/s11739-022-03141-3. Epub 2022 Nov 25. PMID: 36434423. |
|
| |
|
| =Retraction Requests by Experts= | | =Retraction Requests by Experts= |