VLN Cigarette: Difference between revisions
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 152: | Line 152: | ||
===2009: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2573966/ Toxicological Analysis of Low-Nicotine and Nicotine-Free Cigarettes]=== | ===2009: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2573966/ Toxicological Analysis of Low-Nicotine and Nicotine-Free Cigarettes]=== | ||
*In summary, a toxicological analysis does not indicate that low-nicotine and nicotine-free Quest® cigarettes have less adverse toxicological effects in the laboratory than conventional cigarettes. This should draw the attention of the consumers and policy makers. A more comprehensive evaluation in smokers is expected for these new products. | *In summary, a toxicological analysis does not indicate that low-nicotine and nicotine-free Quest® cigarettes have less adverse toxicological effects in the laboratory than conventional cigarettes. This should draw the attention of the consumers and policy makers. A more comprehensive evaluation in smokers is expected for these new products. | ||
==Letters to the FDA CTP in Support or Opposition== | |||
===2025: [https://www.convenience.org/Media/Daily/2025/September/15/2-NACS-Sends-Letter-Opposing-FDA-Proposal_GR NACS Sends Letter Opposing FDA Proposal on Reduced Nicotine]=== | |||
==Statements, Official Comments, Testimony== | ==Statements, Official Comments, Testimony== | ||
===2018: [https://www.iowaattorneygeneral.gov/media/cms/Reduced_Nicotine_ANPRM_Response_180_5BB91F8E318CC.pdf ANPRM comment by Iowa AG, Tom Miller, and leading public health experts]=== | ===2018: [https://www.iowaattorneygeneral.gov/media/cms/Reduced_Nicotine_ANPRM_Response_180_5BB91F8E318CC.pdf ANPRM comment by Iowa AG, Tom Miller, and leading public health experts]=== | ||
*However, we all agree that there is one important requirement common to each of the perspectives above: that is the availability of low-risk non-combustible alternative tobacco or nicotine products that are sufficiently satisfying alternatives to cigarettes that smokers who choose to continue to use nicotine would be willing to switch to them. | *However, we all agree that there is one important requirement common to each of the perspectives above: that is the availability of low-risk non-combustible alternative tobacco or nicotine products that are sufficiently satisfying alternatives to cigarettes that smokers who choose to continue to use nicotine would be willing to switch to them. | ||
==Discussion links BLOGs, Articles, Videos, etc== | ==Discussion links BLOGs, Articles, Videos, etc== | ||
| Line 170: | Line 172: | ||
===2022: [https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2788548 First Modified-Risk Combusted Cigarettes Are Authorized]=== | ===2022: [https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2788548 First Modified-Risk Combusted Cigarettes Are Authorized]=== | ||
===2021: [https://clivebates.com/twenty-reasons-to-be-sceptical-about-rules-lowering-nicotine-levels-in-cigarettes-and-what-to-do-instead/ Twenty reasons to be sceptical about rules lowering nicotine levels in cigarettes – and what to do instead]=== | |||
===2021: [https://clivebates.com/fda-spreads-confusion-about-nicotine-and-smoking/ FDA spreads confusion about nicotine and smoking]=== | ===2021: [https://clivebates.com/fda-spreads-confusion-about-nicotine-and-smoking/ FDA spreads confusion about nicotine and smoking]=== | ||