Nicotine - Stigma: Difference between revisions

m changed sci-hub.se links to sci-hub.in so they work again
 
(15 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 359: Line 359:


===2013: [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/009145091304000107 After the Smoke Has Cleared: Reflections from a Former Smoker and Tobacco Researcher]===
===2013: [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/009145091304000107 After the Smoke Has Cleared: Reflections from a Former Smoker and Tobacco Researcher]===
*[https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/009145091304000107 Sci-Hub (full paper)]
*[https://sci-hub.in/10.1177/009145091304000107 Sci-Hub (full paper)]
*I use the terms “tobacco user” and “people who smoke” to counter the pejorative implications of the term “smoker(s)”
*I use the terms “tobacco user” and “people who smoke” to counter the pejorative implications of the term “smoker(s)”
*I found that most of the tobacco and health advocates I encountered held dismissive and demeaning views about people who smoke...
*I found that most of the tobacco and health advocates I encountered held dismissive and demeaning views about people who smoke...
Line 517: Line 517:


===2008: [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09581590802687358 Tobacco control and the inequitable socio-economic distribution of smoking: smokers’ discourses and implications for tobacco control]===
===2008: [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09581590802687358 Tobacco control and the inequitable socio-economic distribution of smoking: smokers’ discourses and implications for tobacco control]===
*[https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/09581590802687358 Full Study on Sci-Hub]
*[https://sci-hub.in/10.1080/09581590802687358 Full Study on Sci-Hub]
*Few low SES smokers questioned their smoking status, instead framing smoking as a ‘fact of life’. However, there was also a clear sense that tobacco control, and its adherents, are contributing to a sense of stigmatised identity for these smokers.
*Few low SES smokers questioned their smoking status, instead framing smoking as a ‘fact of life’. However, there was also a clear sense that tobacco control, and its adherents, are contributing to a sense of stigmatised identity for these smokers.


Line 537: Line 537:
*Smokers reported feeling shame, guilt and embarrassment for their smoking behavior and used words such as “leper,” “outcast,” “bad person,” “low-life” and “pathetic” to describe themselves, the study found. These feelings increased after failed attempts to quit smoking.
*Smokers reported feeling shame, guilt and embarrassment for their smoking behavior and used words such as “leper,” “outcast,” “bad person,” “low-life” and “pathetic” to describe themselves, the study found. These feelings increased after failed attempts to quit smoking.


=='''Studies, Papers, Reports - Stigma, Smoking, and Lung Cancer'''==
=='''Studies, Papers, Reports, Articles, Blogs, Videos, etc. - Stigma, Smoking, and Lung Cancer'''==
 
===2025: [https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2841677 Age-Based Screening for Lung Cancer Surveillance in the US]===
*"Unlike risk-based lung cancer screening focused exclusively on tobacco smoking, universal breast and colorectal cancer programs have simplified access and increased participation.28 Risk-specific guidelines may deter participation by implying lifestyle blame or creating eligibility confusion, compounded by stigma."
 
=== 2025: Article: [https://archive.ph/hvzZd The hidden reason lung cancer screening is not working]===
*By: Lisa Carter-Bawa, Ph.D., M.P.H., N.P.
 
===2025: IASLC Podcast: [https://www.iaslc.org/iaslc-news/lung-cancer-considered/please-dont-tell-my-family-stigma-and-lung-cancer “Please Don’t Tell My Family”: Stigma and Lung Cancer]===
*Featuring: Narjust Florez MD - Lisa Carter-Bawa PhD, MPH, APRN - Jamie L. Studts PhD
 
===2023: Article: [https://medicalxpress.com/news/2023-09-stigmatization-smoking-related-diseases-barrier-problem.html Stigmatization of smoking-related diseases is a barrier to care, and the problem may be on the rise]===
*"The study, conducted by a team of researchers led by Nathan Harrison, a behavioral scientist and Ph.D. student from Flinders University, in Australia, aimed to identify and synthesize existing interventions to combat stigma associated with lung cancer and smoking-related respiratory diseases, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)."
 
===2023: Op-Ed: [https://filtermag.org/lung-cancer-vaping-misinformation/ Stigma and Misinformation Maintain the Devastating Toll of Lung Cancer]===
*By: Skip Murray


===2022: [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628222000103 Reducing stigma triggered by assessing smoking status among patients diagnosed with lung cancer: De-stigmatizing do and don't lessons learned from qualitative interviews]===
===2022: [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628222000103 Reducing stigma triggered by assessing smoking status among patients diagnosed with lung cancer: De-stigmatizing do and don't lessons learned from qualitative interviews]===
Line 544: Line 559:
===2021: [https://www.lungcancercoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Great-Britain-national-data-pack-FINAL.pdf Great Britain: symptom awareness and attitudes to lung cancer Findings from a global study]===
===2021: [https://www.lungcancercoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Great-Britain-national-data-pack-FINAL.pdf Great Britain: symptom awareness and attitudes to lung cancer Findings from a global study]===
*One in four (25%) people in the UK agreed that they have less sympathy for people with lung cancer than other forms of cancer. Globally, one in five (21%) people agreed that they have less sympathy for people with lung cancer than other forms of cancer.
*One in four (25%) people in the UK agreed that they have less sympathy for people with lung cancer than other forms of cancer. Globally, one in five (21%) people agreed that they have less sympathy for people with lung cancer than other forms of cancer.
===2018: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29800746/ Multilevel Opportunities to Address Lung Cancer Stigma across the Cancer Control Continuum]===
*"Attention to the robust causal connection between smoking and lung cancer, although crucial for tobacco control, may have unintended consequences that generate blaming responses and biased negative perceptions toward patients with lung cancer..."
===2018: Article: [https://connection.asco.org/do/helping-patients-face-lung-cancer-stigma “Please Don’t Tell My Family!”: Helping Patients Face Lung Cancer Stigma]===
*By: Narjust Florez, MD, FASCO
===2017: [https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/decreasing-smoking-increasing-stigma-anti-tobacco-campaigns-public-health-and-cancer-care/2017-05 Decreasing Smoking but Increasing Stigma? Anti-tobacco Campaigns, Public Health, and Cancer Care]===
*"Public health researchers, mental health clinicians, philosophers, and medical ethicists have questioned whether the public health benefits of large-scale anti-tobacco campaigns are justified in light of the potential for exacerbating stigma toward patients diagnosed with lung cancer. Although there is strong evidence for the public health benefits of anti-tobacco campaigns, there is a growing appreciation for the need to better attend to the unintended consequence of lung cancer stigma. We argue that there is an ethical burden for creators of public health campaigns to consider lung cancer stigma in the development and dissemination of hard-hitting anti-tobacco campaigns. We also contend that health care professionals have an ethical responsibility to try to mitigate stigmatizing messages of public health campaigns with empathic patient-clinician communication during clinical encounters."
===2015: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25736473/ Lung cancer stigma as a barrier to medical help-seeking behavior: Practice implications]===
*"Findings support an association between lung cancer stigma and delayed medical help-seeking behavior. Therefore, lung cancer stigma is a potential barrier to timely medical help-seeking behavior in lung cancer symptoms, which can have important patient outcome implications."


===2014: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4634635/ Lung Cancer Stigma, Anxiety, Depression and Quality of Life]===
===2014: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4634635/ Lung Cancer Stigma, Anxiety, Depression and Quality of Life]===
Line 549: Line 576:
*The results of this study confirm our previous findings that LCS [lung cancer stigma] is positively correlated with anxiety and depression and negatively correlated with QOL [quality of life].
*The results of this study confirm our previous findings that LCS [lung cancer stigma] is positively correlated with anxiety and depression and negatively correlated with QOL [quality of life].


=='''Articles, Websites, Blogs - Stigma, Smoking, and Lung Cancer'''==
===2012: [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1471-2407-12-184 A systematic review of the impact of stigma and nihilism on lung cancer outcomes]===
*"There is qualitative evidence that from the patients’ perspectives public health programs contribute to stigma about lung cancer and this was supported by published commentary."


=='''Studies, Papers, Reports - Employment and/or Insurance (People Who Use Nicotine)'''==
=='''Studies, Papers, Reports - Employment and/or Insurance (People Who Use Nicotine)'''==
Line 571: Line 599:


===2017: [https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-law-medicine-and-ethics/article/abs/stigmatizing-the-unhealthy/A5459EB669E1C69C9326C13915D6E379 Stigmatizing the Unhealthy]===
===2017: [https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-law-medicine-and-ethics/article/abs/stigmatizing-the-unhealthy/A5459EB669E1C69C9326C13915D6E379 Stigmatizing the Unhealthy]===
*[https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/1073110517750582 Sci-Hub (full paper)]
*[https://sci-hub.in/10.1177/1073110517750582 Sci-Hub (full paper)]
*The very fact that the Affordable Care Act moved away from health status-based rating in the individual market, with conspicious exceptions for tobacco use and wellness program participation, is telling. The ACA then suffers from an internal tension. On one hand, its supporters framed it as “a civil rights bill for the sick.” On the other, despite eliminating health insurance practices that explicitly disadvantage people based on health, the ACA permits — even encourages — health insurers to charge more to people who use tobacco. Pursuant to the tobacco surcharge, an insurer can opt to charge a tobacco user up to fifty percent more for the same health plan. While many health insurance companies may not opt to charge the full penalty, the ones that do could price out smokers and other tobacco users.
*The very fact that the Affordable Care Act moved away from health status-based rating in the individual market, with conspicious exceptions for tobacco use and wellness program participation, is telling. The ACA then suffers from an internal tension. On one hand, its supporters framed it as “a civil rights bill for the sick.” On the other, despite eliminating health insurance practices that explicitly disadvantage people based on health, the ACA permits — even encourages — health insurers to charge more to people who use tobacco. Pursuant to the tobacco surcharge, an insurer can opt to charge a tobacco user up to fifty percent more for the same health plan. While many health insurance companies may not opt to charge the full penalty, the ones that do could price out smokers and other tobacco users.
*It then comes as no real surprise that the Affordable Care Act’s tobacco surcharge may actually backfire, leading people to drop health insurance rather than to quit smoking. Given both the intervention’s ineffectiveness and its lack of a clear justification for regulating tobacco use and no other health status, we propose that singling out tobacco users may be the result of animus.
*It then comes as no real surprise that the Affordable Care Act’s tobacco surcharge may actually backfire, leading people to drop health insurance rather than to quit smoking. Given both the intervention’s ineffectiveness and its lack of a clear justification for regulating tobacco use and no other health status, we propose that singling out tobacco users may be the result of animus.
Line 813: Line 841:
=Suggestions to add to this page=
=Suggestions to add to this page=


===2015: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4675843/ Validity and Reliability of the Internalized Stigma of Smoking Inventory: An Exploration of Shame, Isolation, and Discrimination in Smokers with Mental Health Diagnoses]===


===2025: [https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/nonprofit-jargon-divides-here-words-use-jzsve/ Nonprofit Jargon Divides. Here Are Words to Use Instead.]===
===2025: [https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/nonprofit-jargon-divides-here-words-use-jzsve/ Nonprofit Jargon Divides. Here Are Words to Use Instead.]===
===2025: [https://conscienhealth.org/2026/01/05/making-a-choice-perpetuate-or-challenge-obesity-stigma/ Making a Choice: Perpetuate or Challenge Obesity Stigma]===


===2021: [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8992888/ Avoiding Ableist Language: Suggestions for Autism Researchers]===
===2021: [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8992888/ Avoiding Ableist Language: Suggestions for Autism Researchers]===
Line 841: Line 870:
* Central to our discussion is the research literature concerned with the concept of state-paternalism in tobacco control—the line between an ethically justified interference with the freedom of those who smoke and an exaggerated infringement disproportionate to the same people’s right to live as they choose.
* Central to our discussion is the research literature concerned with the concept of state-paternalism in tobacco control—the line between an ethically justified interference with the freedom of those who smoke and an exaggerated infringement disproportionate to the same people’s right to live as they choose.
* In countries with an already advanced infrastructure for tobacco control, this dilemma might become quite intrusive for regulators. We ask that if people, who smoke are aware of and have accepted the risks, are willing to pay the price, smoke exclusively in designated areas, and make decisions uninfluenced by persuasive messages from manufacturers—is a further tightening of anti-smoking measures still legitimate?
* In countries with an already advanced infrastructure for tobacco control, this dilemma might become quite intrusive for regulators. We ask that if people, who smoke are aware of and have accepted the risks, are willing to pay the price, smoke exclusively in designated areas, and make decisions uninfluenced by persuasive messages from manufacturers—is a further tightening of anti-smoking measures still legitimate?
** Conclusion: We recommend that a further intensification of smoking control in countries that already have a welldeveloped policy in this area requires that regulators start to exploit the opportunity that lies in the ongoing diversification of the recreational nicotine market.
** Conclusion: We recommend that a further intensification of smoking control in countries that already have a well-developed policy in this area requires that regulators start to exploit the opportunity that lies in the ongoing diversification of the recreational nicotine market.
* Karl Erik Lund and Gunnar Saebo; Harm Reduction Journal (2024) 21:33https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-024-00951-w
* Karl Erik Lund and Gunnar Saebo; Harm Reduction Journal (2024) 21:33https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-024-00951-w
* Funding: Norwegian Institute of Public Health (Governmental)
* Funding: Norwegian Institute of Public Health (Governmental)
Line 850: Line 879:


===2023: [https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/76/10/1860/7016316 Call to Action: Prioritizing the Use of Inclusive, Nonstigmatizing Language in Scientific Communications]===
===2023: [https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/76/10/1860/7016316 Call to Action: Prioritizing the Use of Inclusive, Nonstigmatizing Language in Scientific Communications]===
===2023: [https://medicalxpress.com/news/2023-09-stigmatization-smoking-related-diseases-barrier-problem.html Stigmatization of smoking-related diseases is a barrier to care, and the problem may be on the rise]===


===2023: [https://www.psychiatrist.com/pcc/addiction/substance-use-disorders/curbing-physician-stigma-toward-adolescents-with-nicotine-opiate-use/ Curbing Physician Stigma Toward Adolescents With Nicotine and Opiate Use]===
===2023: [https://www.psychiatrist.com/pcc/addiction/substance-use-disorders/curbing-physician-stigma-toward-adolescents-with-nicotine-opiate-use/ Curbing Physician Stigma Toward Adolescents With Nicotine and Opiate Use]===
Line 861: Line 888:
===2022: [https://vimeo.com/showcase/9893575/video/779678704 Clive Bates at E-Cig Summit 2022]===
===2022: [https://vimeo.com/showcase/9893575/video/779678704 Clive Bates at E-Cig Summit 2022]===
*Ontology - Stigmatizing labels. The difference between addiction and dependence.
*Ontology - Stigmatizing labels. The difference between addiction and dependence.
===2017: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28553905/ Decreasing Smoking but Increasing Stigma? Anti-tobacco Campaigns, Public Health, and Cancer Care]===


===2014: [https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(14)00770-0/fulltext Stop Talking ‘Dirty’: Clinicians, Language, and Quality of Care for the Leading Cause of Preventable Death in the United States]===
===2014: [https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(14)00770-0/fulltext Stop Talking ‘Dirty’: Clinicians, Language, and Quality of Care for the Leading Cause of Preventable Death in the United States]===


===2008: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18502551/ Stigma and the ethics of public health: not can we but should we]===
===2008: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18502551/ Stigma and the ethics of public health: not can we but should we]===
===2018: [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6330014/ Substance use, recovery, and linguistics: The impact of word choice on explicit and implicit bias]===
*See also: [https://www.recoveryanswers.org/research-post/the-real-stigma-of-substance-use-disorders/ The real stigma of substance use disorders]
===2020: [https://filtermag.org/language-addiction-treatment/ The Real Harms of Abusive, Stigmatizing Language in Addiction Treatment]===