Nicotine / THR - Statements from Experts: Difference between revisions

Line 396: Line 396:


===Deborah Arnott===
===Deborah Arnott===
*[https://ash.org.uk/media-and-news/ash-spokespeople/ Bio and Photo]
*[https://ash.org.uk/media-and-news/ash-spokespeople/ Bio and Photo] / [http://tobacco.cleartheair.org.hk/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/bmj.h3317.full_.pdf Quote Source] / [https://twitter.com/DeborahArnott Follow on Twitter]
*[http://tobacco.cleartheair.org.hk/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/bmj.h3317.full_.pdf Quote Source]
Over at ASH, however, Arnott summarily dismisses such fears. “There are people in the public health community who are obsessed by e-cigarettes,” she says. “This idea that it renormalises smoking is absolute bullshit.” Furthermore, she insists, “There is no evidence so far that it is a gateway into
Over at ASH, however, Arnott summarily dismisses such fears. “There are people in the public health community who are obsessed by e-cigarettes,” she says. “This idea that it renormalises smoking is absolute bullshit.” Furthermore, she insists, “There is no evidence so far that it is a gateway into
smoking for young people.” ASH’s concern, she says, “is quite the reverse—that because there is so much bad publicity about them, people’s understanding about the relative risk of smoking and e-cigarettes is being undermined. The risk is that smokers who could potentially use these as an alternative to smoking are being discouraged, and that’s not a good thing.” For Arnott, the concept of harm reduction boils down to a simple proposition: “Do you want the tobacco industry to carry on making cigarettes which are highly addictive and kill when used as intended, or do you want them to move to a product which is much nearer licensed nicotine replacement therapy and is unlikely to kill anyone?”
smoking for young people.” ASH’s concern, she says, “is quite the reverse—that because there is so much bad publicity about them, people’s understanding about the relative risk of smoking and e-cigarettes is being undermined. The risk is that smokers who could potentially use these as an alternative to smoking are being discouraged, and that’s not a good thing.” For Arnott, the concept of harm reduction boils down to a simple proposition: “Do you want the tobacco industry to carry on making cigarettes which are highly addictive and kill when used as intended, or do you want them to move to a product which is much nearer licensed nicotine replacement therapy and is unlikely to kill anyone?”