Funded Watchdogs and Counters: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
m (light cleanup)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The [https://tobaccotactics.org/ University of Bath Tobacco Control Group] has been discussed elsewhere. It has recently received a further boost in funding from Bloomberg Philanthropies to fulfill a [https://exposetobacco.org/about/ STOP] campaign to the tune of $20 million. This was to enhance the self-appointed role that the University of Bath Tobacco Control group had established as Watchdog for the Tobacco Industry.  
The [https://tobaccotactics.org/ University of Bath Tobacco Control Group] has been discussed elsewhere. It has recently received a further boost in funding from Bloomberg Philanthropies to fulfill a [https://exposetobacco.org/about/ STOP] campaign to the tune of $20 million. This was to enhance the self-appointed role that the University of Bath Tobacco Control group had established as Watchdog for the Tobacco Industry.  


The exact opposite in terms of funding and content is [https://www.tctactics.org/index.php?title=Main_Page Tobacco Control Tactics] who challenge the findings and rationale of the other group.
The exact opposite in terms of funding and content is [https://www.tctactics.org/index.php?title=Main_Page Tobacco Control Tactics] who challenge the findings and rationale of the other group. One particular perceptive and telling quotation from that entry is contained here
Administrators, administrator, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Suppressors, Administrators, translator
211

edits