Global news flow: Difference between revisions
Add: pages. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Superegz | Category:Communication | #UCB_Category 14/145 |
Richardpruen (talk | contribs) m 1 revision imported: templates |
||
(No difference)
| |||
Latest revision as of 09:58, 8 August 2023
Global news flow (also referred to as international news flow) is a field of study that deals with the news coverage of events in foreign countries. It describes and explains the flow of news from one country to another.[1]
Studies on global news flow typically attempt to understand why certain countries are more newsworthy than others..[2][3] Along the years it has been found that the economic power of countries plays a particularly crucial role in their news prominence[4] as well as the presence of international news agencies.[5] Thus, the US has been found to be very prominent in news mentions around the world (18%), followed by China, Western European and Middle Eastern countries (about 3-5% each).[1]
The unequal representation of the world and the under-representation of developing countries have been already of a great concern at least since the 1950s, since they influence the way people perceive the world and the image of countries.[6] This problem was later addressed in the MacBride report, and his set of recommendations for a New World Information and Communication Order. The unequal representation of the world has been also linked to the World System Theory, and the unequal economic structure of the world.[7]
A 2014 study, examining 35 popular news website in ten different languages over a two-year study period, found that "the United States is by far the most prominent country in the news sites that we studied from around the world, except for the French and Arabic ones" and the "network structure of news links clearly exhibits [the U.S.'s] key position as the centerpiece of a global system."[4]
A 2015 study published in the journalism Journalism, examining "validity and limits of the news flow theory," found that "Over-represented regional centers in West Europe and Asia overshadow the under-represented regional peripheries in East Europe and the Middle East" and that the United States and Africa "serve as a global center and a periphery respectively."[8]
See also
- Media imperialism
- World news
- International communication
- New World Information and Communication Order
- MacBride report
References
- ^ a b Segev, Elad (2016). International News Online: Global Views with Local Perspectives. New York: Peter Lang. pp. 139–153. ISBN 9781433129841.
- ^ Kariel, Herbert G.; Rosenvall, Lynn A. (1984). "Factors influencing international news flow". Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. 61 (3): 509–516. doi:10.1177/107769908406100305. S2CID 144352647.
- ^ Kim, K., & Barnett, G. A. (1996). The determinants of international news flow a network analysis. Communication Research, 23(3), 323-352.
- ^ a b Segev, Elad; Blondheim, Menahem (2013). "America's global standing according to popular news sites from around the world". Political Communication. 30 (1): 139–161. doi:10.1080/10584609.2012.737418. S2CID 143898179.
- ^ Wu, H. D. (2000). Systemic determinants of international news coverage: A comparison of 38 countries. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 110-130.
- ^ UNESCO (1954). How Nations See Each Other? Paris: UNESCO Publications.
- ^ Chang, T. K. (1998). All Countries Not Created Equal to Be News World System and International Communication. Communication research, 25(5), 528-563.
- ^ Segev, Elad (2015). "Visible and invisible countries: News flow theory revised". Journalism. 16 (3): 412–428. doi:10.1177/1464884914521579. S2CID 144164340.