VLN Cigarette: Difference between revisions
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
*17 people completed the study. | *17 people completed the study. | ||
*Although replication with larger samples and longer access is needed, results indicate nicotine reduction to ≤2.3 mg/g in cigarettes would attenuate reinforcement. This choice procedure may efficiently inform future clinical trials to assess relative reinforcing effects of smoking reduced nicotine cigarettes. | *Although replication with larger samples and longer access is needed, results indicate nicotine reduction to ≤2.3 mg/g in cigarettes would attenuate reinforcement. This choice procedure may efficiently inform future clinical trials to assess relative reinforcing effects of smoking reduced nicotine cigarettes. | ||
===2020: [https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/psp/hbpr/2020/00000007/00000006/art00004 Measuring Support for Requiring Reduced Nicotine Cigarettes: Issues with Questions, Answers, and Respondents]=== | |||
*"Survey design, including question type and the response order, resulted in a substantial difference in participant responses. Better and multiple questions may be needed before drawing conclusions about mandatory reduced nicotine cigarettes support, especially among smokers." | |||
===2019: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6939783/ Misperceptions of Nicotine and Nicotine Reduction: The Importance of Public Education to Maximize the Benefits of a Nicotine Reduction Standard]=== | ===2019: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6939783/ Misperceptions of Nicotine and Nicotine Reduction: The Importance of Public Education to Maximize the Benefits of a Nicotine Reduction Standard]=== | ||