Page history
31 January 2024
Skip
→2021: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis of Youth Smoking and a Ban on Sales of Flavored Tobacco Products in San Francisco, California
+374
Skip
→2022: PREPRINT: A decision aid for policymakers to estimate the impact of e-cigarette flavour restrictions on population smoking and e-cigarette use prevalence among youth versus smoking prevalence among adults
−374
Skip
no edit summary
−5,474
Skip
no edit summary
−10
Skip
no edit summary
+784
Skip
no edit summary
−199
Skip
→2023: Responses to real-world and hypothetical e-cigarette flavor bans among US young adults who use flavored e-cigarettes
+1,073
Skip
no edit summary
−143
Skip
no edit summary
−421
Skip
no edit summary
−209
Skip
no edit summary
+459
Skip
no edit summary
−180
23 January 2024
9 January 2024
28 September 2023
11 July 2023
Skip
no edit summary
−6
Skip
→2022: Impact of existing and potential e-cigarette flavor restrictions on e-cigarette use among young adult e-cigarette users in 6 US metropolitan areas
+1,125
Skip
→2022: Effect of flavored E-cigarette bans in the United States: What does the evidence show?
+458
Skip
→2022: Association of device type, flavours and vaping behaviour with tobacco product transitions among adult electronic cigarette users in the USA
+235
Skip
→2022: Associations between e-cigarette use and e-cigarette flavors with cigarette smoking quit attempts and quit success: Evidence from a US large, nationally representative 2018-2019 survey
+332
26 March 2023
16 November 2022
6 November 2022
17 October 2022
23 September 2022
12 August 2022
24 July 2022
28 June 2022
19 January 2022
16 January 2022
15 January 2022
Skip
→Further Reading
+1,146
Skip
formatting
−625
Skip
formatting
−301
Skip
formatting
+6
Skip
formatting
+4
Skip
formatting
+2
Skip
no edit summary
−401
Skip
formatting
+5
Skip
2021 Vaping liquid flavour preferences, oral nicotine pouch and cannabis use: A survey of participants in the 2019 Oceania Vape Expo
+1,842
14 January 2022
11 January 2022
10 January 2022
Skip
THE CASE FOR FLAVOURS IN TOBACCO HARM REDUCTION, TO SAVE LIVES
+480
Skip
Moved Suggestion to proper category on page: THE CASE FOR FLAVOURS IN TOBACCO HARM REDUCTION, TO SAVE LIVES
−167
Skip
Moved Suggestion to proper category on page: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis of Youth Smoking and a Ban on Sales of Flavored Tobacco Products in San Francisco, California
−189
Skip
Friedman AS. A Difference-in-Differences Analysis of Youth Smoking and a Ban on Sales of Flavored Tobacco Products in San Francisco, California. JAMA Pediatr. 2021;175(8):863-865. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.0922
+1,108
Skip
Reactions to Sales Restrictions on Flavored Vape Products or All Vape Products Among Young Adults in the United States
+804
Skip
added source
+157
Skip
fixing broken link
−1,019
Skip
fixing broken link using way back machine
+47