(Adding: Statements, Official Comments, Testimony) |
|||
| Line 117: | Line 117: | ||
===2009: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2573966/ Toxicological Analysis of Low-Nicotine and Nicotine-Free Cigarettes]=== | ===2009: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2573966/ Toxicological Analysis of Low-Nicotine and Nicotine-Free Cigarettes]=== | ||
*In summary, a toxicological analysis does not indicate that low-nicotine and nicotine-free Quest® cigarettes have less adverse toxicological effects in the laboratory than conventional cigarettes. This should draw the attention of the consumers and policy makers. A more comprehensive evaluation in smokers is expected for these new products. | *In summary, a toxicological analysis does not indicate that low-nicotine and nicotine-free Quest® cigarettes have less adverse toxicological effects in the laboratory than conventional cigarettes. This should draw the attention of the consumers and policy makers. A more comprehensive evaluation in smokers is expected for these new products. | ||
==Statements, Official Comments, Testimony== | |||
===2018: [https://www.iowaattorneygeneral.gov/media/cms/Reduced_Nicotine_ANPRM_Response_180_5BB91F8E318CC.pdf ANPRM comment by Iowa AG, Tom Miller, and leading public health experts]=== | |||
*However, we all agree that there is one important requirement common to each of the perspectives above: that is the availability of low-risk non-combustible alternative tobacco or nicotine products that are sufficiently satisfying alternatives to cigarettes that smokers who choose to continue to use nicotine would be willing to switch to them. | |||
==Discussion links BLOGs, Articles, Videos, etc== | ==Discussion links BLOGs, Articles, Videos, etc== | ||
edits