ETHRA: Difference between revisions
Richardpruen (talk | contribs) add ethra |
Richardpruen (talk | contribs) added stub |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__TOC__ | |||
== About ETHRA == | == About ETHRA == | ||
| Line 7: | Line 9: | ||
== ETHRA core principles == | == ETHRA core principles == | ||
<center><span class="fa fa-ambulance fa-3x"></span></center>We support tobacco harm reduction.<center><span class="fa fa-area-chart fa-3x"></span></center>We know from personal experience and science that a variety of delivery methods and flavours enhances the ability of smokers to quit, and oppose any regulation that restricts this.<center><span class="fa fa-gavel fa-3x"></span></center>Regulation must always consider the minimal risks of harm reduced products versus the large risks of smoking and ensure that these are reflected.<center><span class="fa fa-heartbeat fa-3x"></span></center>We believe that the health and lives of adult smokers and ex smokers should always be taken into account when quantifying the risk to young people.<center><span class="fa fa-dollar fa-3x"></span></center>Reduced risk products need to be affordable and there is no case to apply tobacco excise duties to products that offer a much safer alternative to smoking. | <center><span class="fa fa-ambulance fa-3x"></span></center>We support tobacco harm reduction.<center><span class="fa fa-area-chart fa-3x"></span></center>We know from personal experience and science that a variety of delivery methods and flavours enhances the ability of smokers to quit, and oppose any regulation that restricts this.<center><span class="fa fa-gavel fa-3x"></span></center>Regulation must always consider the minimal risks of harm reduced products versus the large risks of smoking and ensure that these are reflected.<center><span class="fa fa-heartbeat fa-3x"></span></center>We believe that the health and lives of adult smokers and ex smokers should always be taken into account when quantifying the risk to young people.<center><span class="fa fa-dollar fa-3x"></span></center>Reduced risk products need to be affordable and there is no case to apply tobacco excise duties to products that offer a much safer alternative to smoking. | ||
{{Stub}} | |||
[[Category: THR Advocacy Group]] | |||
[[Category:Consumer Advocacy Organization]] | |||