Myth: Alternative nicotine products don't help people stop smoking: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 121: | Line 121: | ||
*A detailed economic analysis confirmed that, because e-cigarettes incur lower NHS costs than NRT and generate a higher quit rate, e-cigarette use is more cost-effective. | *A detailed economic analysis confirmed that, because e-cigarettes incur lower NHS costs than NRT and generate a higher quit rate, e-cigarette use is more cost-effective. | ||
*[https://njl-admin.nihr.ac.uk/document/download/2030301 PDF Version] | *[https://njl-admin.nihr.ac.uk/document/download/2030301 PDF Version] | ||
===2019: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31300577/ Effect of Electronic Cigarettes on Smoking Reduction and Cessation in Korean Male Smokers: A Randomized Controlled Study]=== | |||
* In our study, the effect of e-cigarettes on smoking cessation was similar compared with that of nicotine gum, a well-documented NRT. In addition, e-cigarettes were well tolerated by the study population. Therefore, the use of e-cigarettes as an NRT may be considered for smoking-cessation purposes. | |||
*[https://sci-hub.se/10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.180384 PDF Version] | |||
===2019: [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/add.14829 Cost‐effectiveness of e‐cigarettes compared with nicotine replacement therapy in stop smoking services in England (TEC study): a randomized controlled trial]=== | |||
*Using e‐cigarettes as a smoking cessation aid with standard behavioural support in stop‐smoking services in England is likely to be more cost‐effective than using nicotine replacement therapy in the same setting. | |||
*[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/add.14829 PDF Version] | |||
<br> | <br> | ||