Myth: Alternative nicotine products are as dangerous as smoking: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Tag: Reverted |
Tag: Reverted |
||
| Line 606: | Line 606: | ||
*[https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/15376516.2016.1217112 PDF Version] | *[https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/15376516.2016.1217112 PDF Version] | ||
*Citation: Azzopardi, D., Patel, K., Jaunky, T., Santopietro, S., Camacho, O. M., McAughey, J., & Gaça, M. (2016). Electronic cigarette aerosol induces significantly less cytotoxicity than tobacco smoke. Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods, 26(6), 477–491. doi:10.1080/15376516.2016.1217112 | *Citation: Azzopardi, D., Patel, K., Jaunky, T., Santopietro, S., Camacho, O. M., McAughey, J., & Gaça, M. (2016). Electronic cigarette aerosol induces significantly less cytotoxicity than tobacco smoke. Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods, 26(6), 477–491. doi:10.1080/15376516.2016.1217112 | ||
===2016: [https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6b00188# Chemical Composition of Aerosol from an E-Cigarette: A Quantitative Comparison with Cigarette Smoke]=== | |||
*Thus, the aerosol from the e-cigarette is compositionally less complex than cigarette smoke and contains significantly lower levels of toxicants. | |||
*Citation: Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2016, 29, 10, 1662–1678 Publication Date:September 18, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6b00188 | |||
===2014 [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230014002505?fbclid=IwAR0ivUs1bNfN2HGxl240LRHiCSB-EJ7xIhR4WNEQxZUgEKHGlAQ_RvNkHBU Comparison of select analytes in aerosol from e-cigarettes with smoke from conventional cigarettes and with ambient air]=== | ===2014 [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230014002505?fbclid=IwAR0ivUs1bNfN2HGxl240LRHiCSB-EJ7xIhR4WNEQxZUgEKHGlAQ_RvNkHBU Comparison of select analytes in aerosol from e-cigarettes with smoke from conventional cigarettes and with ambient air]=== | ||
| Line 611: | Line 615: | ||
*No significant contribution of tested HPHC classes was found for the e-cigarettes. | *No significant contribution of tested HPHC classes was found for the e-cigarettes. | ||
*[https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.10.010 PDF Version] | *[https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.10.010 PDF Version] | ||
*Citation: Tayyarah, R., & Long, G. A. (2014). Comparison of select analytes in aerosol from e-cigarettes with smoke from conventional cigarettes and with ambient air. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 70(3), 704–710. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.10.010 | *Citation: Tayyarah, R., & Long, G. A. (2014). Comparison of select analytes in aerosol from e-cigarettes with smoke from conventional cigarettes and with ambient air. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 70(3), 704–710. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.10.010 | ||
===2014 [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4110871/ Safety evaluation and risk assessment of electronic cigarettes as tobacco cigarette substitutes: a systematic review]=== | ===2014 [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4110871/ Safety evaluation and risk assessment of electronic cigarettes as tobacco cigarette substitutes: a systematic review]=== | ||