Nicotine - Retracted Studies, Papers, and Articles: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→COVID) Tag: Reverted |
(→COPD) Tag: Manual revert |
||
Line 127: | Line 127: | ||
**"Glantz’s meta-analysis is not just junk science because of details about the studies, though those are problems in themselves. It is junk science because there are probably not even two of the studies in his collection that are similar enough to average together, let alone all of them." (Phillips) | **"Glantz’s meta-analysis is not just junk science because of details about the studies, though those are problems in themselves. It is junk science because there are probably not even two of the studies in his collection that are similar enough to average together, let alone all of them." (Phillips) | ||
*Referring to: Kalkhoran S, Glantz SA. E-cigarettes and smoking cessation in real-world and clinical settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Feb;4(2):116-28. [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26776875/ doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00521-4]. Epub 2016 Jan 14. PMID: 26776875; PMCID: PMC4752870. | *Referring to: Kalkhoran S, Glantz SA. E-cigarettes and smoking cessation in real-world and clinical settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Feb;4(2):116-28. [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26776875/ doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00521-4]. Epub 2016 Jan 14. PMID: 26776875; PMCID: PMC4752870. | ||
==COVID== | ==COVID== |