Nicotine - Retracted Studies, Papers, and Articles: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
*"To this last point, Pierce and Strong’s response now reports a relevant analysis, and it directly contradicts their assertion in the original paper: they demonstrate that dependence among JUUL users in each age cohort was not different from dependence in users of other ENDS brands (though the trend is evidently for lower dependence among JUUL users)." (Shiffman) | *"To this last point, Pierce and Strong’s response now reports a relevant analysis, and it directly contradicts their assertion in the original paper: they demonstrate that dependence among JUUL users in each age cohort was not different from dependence in users of other ENDS brands (though the trend is evidently for lower dependence among JUUL users)." (Shiffman) | ||
*Referring To: Pierce JP, Leas EC, Strong DR. Biochemical Validation of Dependence on JUUL and Other E-Cigarettes Among Youth. Pediatrics. 2023 Apr 1;151(4):e2022059158. PMID: 36942497. doi: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2022-059158 | *Referring To: Pierce JP, Leas EC, Strong DR. Biochemical Validation of Dependence on JUUL and Other E-Cigarettes Among Youth. Pediatrics. 2023 Apr 1;151(4):e2022059158. PMID: 36942497. doi: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2022-059158 | ||
===2022: Comments RE: [https://pubpeer.com/publications/1FF8B75DFC81492DEBC8E214F63098 Consumption of JUUL vs. Other E-Cigarette Brands among U.S. E-Cigarette Users: Evidence from Wave 5 of the PATH Study]=== | |||
*A re-analysis of the data by Foxon & Shiffman (2) revealed that those analyses did not include replicate weights as specified in guidance from the PATH study team. Foxon & Shiffman (2) show that when the above analyses are performed with the replicate weights included, the associations above are statistically non-significant. (Foxon, Shiffman) | |||
**(2) [https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/18/6715 Full Comment] | |||
*Referring to: Wang Y, Duan Z, Weaver SR, Popova L, Spears CA, Ashley DL, Pechacek TF, Eriksen MP, Huang J. Consumption of JUUL vs. Other E-Cigarette Brands among U.S. E-Cigarette Users: Evidence from Wave 5 of the PATH Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(17):10837. [https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710837 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710837] | |||
===2021: Comments RE: [https://pubpeer.com/publications/57A74561DC4B1B43B91E18A95A24A5 Use frequency and symptoms of nicotine dependence among adolescent E-cigarette users: Comparison of JUUL and Non-JUUL users]=== | ===2021: Comments RE: [https://pubpeer.com/publications/57A74561DC4B1B43B91E18A95A24A5 Use frequency and symptoms of nicotine dependence among adolescent E-cigarette users: Comparison of JUUL and Non-JUUL users]=== | ||