ENDS Flavors: Difference between revisions
| Line 179: | Line 179: | ||
=Regulations or Unintended Consequences= <!--T:42--> | =Regulations or Unintended Consequences= <!--T:42--> | ||
===2024: [https://harmreductionjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12954-024-01003-z Exploring the opinions and potential impact of unflavoured e-liquid on smoking cessation among people who smoke and smoking relapse among people who previously smoked and now use e-cigarettes: findings from a UK-based mixed methods study]=== | |||
*"The findings highlight that people who smoke and vape could be impacted by flavour restrictions in a range of ways, some of which could have a potential adverse impact on harm reduction efforts in the UK (e.g., by making smoking more appealing than vaping)." | |||
**Citation: Khouja, J.N., Dyer, M.L., Havill, M.A. et al. Exploring the opinions and potential impact of unflavoured e-liquid on smoking cessation among people who smoke and smoking relapse among people who previously smoked and now use e-cigarettes: findings from a UK-based mixed methods study. Harm Reduct J 21, 90 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-024-01003-z | |||
===2023: [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4586701 E-cigarette Flavor Restrictions’ Effects on Tobacco Product Sales]=== | ===2023: [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4586701 E-cigarette Flavor Restrictions’ Effects on Tobacco Product Sales]=== | ||
*"Over 375 US localities and 7 states have adopted permanent restrictions on sales of flavored electronic nicotine delivery systems (“ENDS”). These policies’ effects on combustible cigarette use, a more harmful habit, remain unclear. Matching new flavor policy data to retail sales data, we find a tradeoff of 12 additional cigarettes for every 1 less 0.7 mL ENDS pod sold due to ENDS flavor restrictions. Further, cigarette sales increase even among brands disproportionately used by underage youth. Thus, any public health benefits of reducing ENDS sales via flavor restrictions may be offset by public health costs from increased cigarette sales." | *"Over 375 US localities and 7 states have adopted permanent restrictions on sales of flavored electronic nicotine delivery systems (“ENDS”). These policies’ effects on combustible cigarette use, a more harmful habit, remain unclear. Matching new flavor policy data to retail sales data, we find a tradeoff of 12 additional cigarettes for every 1 less 0.7 mL ENDS pod sold due to ENDS flavor restrictions. Further, cigarette sales increase even among brands disproportionately used by underage youth. Thus, any public health benefits of reducing ENDS sales via flavor restrictions may be offset by public health costs from increased cigarette sales." | ||
*Citation: Friedman, Abigail and Liber, Alex C. and Crippen, Alyssa and Pesko, Michael, E-cigarette Flavor Restrictions’ Effects on Tobacco Product Sales (September 26, 2023). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4586701 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4586701 | **Citation: Friedman, Abigail and Liber, Alex C. and Crippen, Alyssa and Pesko, Michael, E-cigarette Flavor Restrictions’ Effects on Tobacco Product Sales (September 26, 2023). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4586701 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4586701 | ||
===2023: [https://academic.oup.com/ntr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/ntr/ntad258/7492743 Responses to real-world and hypothetical e-cigarette flavor bans among US young adults who use flavored e-cigarettes]=== | ===2023: [https://academic.oup.com/ntr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/ntr/ntad258/7492743 Responses to real-world and hypothetical e-cigarette flavor bans among US young adults who use flavored e-cigarettes]=== | ||