Nicotine / THR - Guides for Policymakers & Advocates: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
new header |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
<!--T:3--> | <!--T:3--> | ||
*Written by AHRA - Africa Harm Reduction Alliance - 2020 | *Written by AHRA - Africa Harm Reduction Alliance - 2020 | ||
=Educational Materials= <!--T:4--> | =Educational Materials= <!--T:4--> | ||
===[https://www.clivebates.com/vaping-tobacco-harm-reduction-nicotine-science-and-policy-q-a/ Nicotine science and policy Q & A]=== <!--T:5--> | ===[https://www.clivebates.com/vaping-tobacco-harm-reduction-nicotine-science-and-policy-q-a/ Nicotine science and policy Q & A]=== <!--T:5--> | ||
| Line 25: | Line 23: | ||
*By: Clive Bates / The counterfactual | *By: Clive Bates / The counterfactual | ||
*"Welcome, this is my (Clive) 2020 Q & A on nicotine science and policy. It mostly focusses on nicotine vaping as an alternative to smoking, but most of the argument also applies to heated tobacco products, modern smokeless tobacco and new oral nicotine products. It consists of about 60 questions and builds on a brief [https://www.clivebates.com/vaping-policy-rapid-questions-and-answers/ Q & A that I submitted to a consultation], a critique of an absurd [https://www.clivebates.com/world-health-organisation-fails-at-science-and-fails-at-propaganda-the-sad-case-of-whos-anti-vaping-qa/ anti-vaping Q & A by the WHO] and my [https://www.clivebates.com/vaping-risk-compared-to-smoking-challenging-false-dangerous-claim-by-stanton-glantz/ critique of numerous false and misleading claims made by Professor Stanton Glantz]." | *"Welcome, this is my (Clive) 2020 Q & A on nicotine science and policy. It mostly focusses on nicotine vaping as an alternative to smoking, but most of the argument also applies to heated tobacco products, modern smokeless tobacco and new oral nicotine products. It consists of about 60 questions and builds on a brief [https://www.clivebates.com/vaping-policy-rapid-questions-and-answers/ Q & A that I submitted to a consultation], a critique of an absurd [https://www.clivebates.com/world-health-organisation-fails-at-science-and-fails-at-propaganda-the-sad-case-of-whos-anti-vaping-qa/ anti-vaping Q & A by the WHO] and my [https://www.clivebates.com/vaping-risk-compared-to-smoking-challenging-false-dangerous-claim-by-stanton-glantz/ critique of numerous false and misleading claims made by Professor Stanton Glantz]." | ||
===[https://t.co/Lk8XrZ6KRI?amp=1 E-CIGARETTE POLICY BRIEF: Seven Things Policy Makers Need to Know]=== <!--T:7--> | ===[https://t.co/Lk8XrZ6KRI?amp=1 E-CIGARETTE POLICY BRIEF: Seven Things Policy Makers Need to Know]=== <!--T:7--> | ||
| Line 32: | Line 29: | ||
*Quick 1 page guide | *Quick 1 page guide | ||
*All references are hyperlinked to official WHO and government reports, and peer-reviewed studies | *All references are hyperlinked to official WHO and government reports, and peer-reviewed studies | ||
===[https://mailchi.mp/5165e20d33ee/trprblueprint A Blueprint for Better Regulation]=== <!--T:9--> | ===[https://mailchi.mp/5165e20d33ee/trprblueprint A Blueprint for Better Regulation]=== <!--T:9--> | ||
| Line 38: | Line 34: | ||
<!--T:10--> | <!--T:10--> | ||
*Written by UKVIA - [https://www.ukvia.co.uk/ UK Vaping Industry Association] - 2021 | *Written by UKVIA - [https://www.ukvia.co.uk/ UK Vaping Industry Association] - 2021 | ||
===TPA Series: [https://www.protectingtaxpayers.org/thr-101/ THR 101]=== | ===TPA Series: [https://www.protectingtaxpayers.org/thr-101/ THR 101]=== | ||
| Line 51: | Line 46: | ||
*[https://www.protectingtaxpayers.org/wp-content/uploads/THR-101-Vaping-Injuries.pdf Vaping Lung Injuries (aka: EVALI)] | *[https://www.protectingtaxpayers.org/wp-content/uploads/THR-101-Vaping-Injuries.pdf Vaping Lung Injuries (aka: EVALI)] | ||
*[https://www.protectingtaxpayers.org/wp-content/uploads/THR-101-Youth-Reasons.pdf Youth Use Reasons] | *[https://www.protectingtaxpayers.org/wp-content/uploads/THR-101-Youth-Reasons.pdf Youth Use Reasons] | ||
===[https://www.protectingtaxpayers.org/e-cigarettes/tobacco-vaping-101-50-state-analysis-4// Tobacco & Vaping 101: 50 State Analysis]=== | ===[https://www.protectingtaxpayers.org/e-cigarettes/tobacco-vaping-101-50-state-analysis-4// Tobacco & Vaping 101: 50 State Analysis]=== | ||
| Line 60: | Line 54: | ||
<!--T:12--> | <!--T:12--> | ||
*Written by Lindsey Stroud - Webmaster of [https://www.thr101.org/ Tobacco Harm Reduction 101] | *Written by Lindsey Stroud - Webmaster of [https://www.thr101.org/ Tobacco Harm Reduction 101] | ||
===[https://www.atr.org/tholos-foundation-releases-vaping-tobacco-harm-reduction-the-path-to-saving-millions-of-lives-2023-report/ Vaping & Tobacco Harm Reduction: The Path to Saving Millions of Lives]=== | ===[https://www.atr.org/tholos-foundation-releases-vaping-tobacco-harm-reduction-the-path-to-saving-millions-of-lives-2023-report/ Vaping & Tobacco Harm Reduction: The Path to Saving Millions of Lives]=== | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
=Why= <!--T:13--> | =Why= <!--T:13--> | ||
===[https://innco.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/INNCO-LMIC-English.pdf 10 reasons why blanket bans of e-cigarettes and HTPs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are not fit for purpose]=== <!--T:14--> | ===[https://innco.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/INNCO-LMIC-English.pdf 10 reasons why blanket bans of e-cigarettes and HTPs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are not fit for purpose]=== <!--T:14--> | ||
| Line 73: | Line 64: | ||
<!--T:15--> | <!--T:15--> | ||
*Written by INNCO - [https://innco.org/ International Network of Nicotine Consumer Organisations] - 2021 | *Written by INNCO - [https://innco.org/ International Network of Nicotine Consumer Organisations] - 2021 | ||
===[https://cei.org/studies/fear-profiteers/ Fear Profiteers: How E-cigarette Panic Benefits Health Activists]=== <!--T:16--> | ===[https://cei.org/studies/fear-profiteers/ Fear Profiteers: How E-cigarette Panic Benefits Health Activists]=== <!--T:16--> | ||
Revision as of 10:46, 6 September 2024
Advocates
Saving Lives - An Advocates Guide To Tobacco Harm Reduction
- Written by AHRA - Africa Harm Reduction Alliance - 2020
Educational Materials
Nicotine science and policy Q & A
- By: Clive Bates / The counterfactual
- "Welcome, this is my (Clive) 2020 Q & A on nicotine science and policy. It mostly focusses on nicotine vaping as an alternative to smoking, but most of the argument also applies to heated tobacco products, modern smokeless tobacco and new oral nicotine products. It consists of about 60 questions and builds on a brief Q & A that I submitted to a consultation, a critique of an absurd anti-vaping Q & A by the WHO and my critique of numerous false and misleading claims made by Professor Stanton Glantz."
E-CIGARETTE POLICY BRIEF: Seven Things Policy Makers Need to Know
- Quick 1 page guide
- All references are hyperlinked to official WHO and government reports, and peer-reviewed studies
A Blueprint for Better Regulation
- Written by UKVIA - UK Vaping Industry Association - 2021
TPA Series: THR 101
- Cessation
- Dual Use
- Flavors
- Harm Reduction
- Heated Tobacco (aka: HTP, HnB)
- Popcorn Lung
- Nicotine Pouches
- Snus
- Vaping Lung Injuries (aka: EVALI)
- Youth Use Reasons
Tobacco & Vaping 101: 50 State Analysis
TOBACCO HARM REDUCTION 101: A GUIDEBOOK FOR POLICYMAKERS
- Written by Lindsey Stroud - Webmaster of Tobacco Harm Reduction 101
Vaping & Tobacco Harm Reduction: The Path to Saving Millions of Lives
Why
10 reasons why blanket bans of e-cigarettes and HTPs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are not fit for purpose
- Written by INNCO - International Network of Nicotine Consumer Organisations - 2021
Fear Profiteers: How E-cigarette Panic Benefits Health Activists
- Written by Michelle Minton - Competitive Enterprises Institute - 2018
Promoting Harm Reduction Policies
- The simulation suggests that the promotion of e-cigarettes as a harm-reduction policy is a viable strategy, given current evidence that e-cigarettes offset or divert from smoking. Given the strong effects of implementation challenges on policy effectiveness in the short term, accurately modeling such obstacles can usefully inform policy design.
- PDF Version
- Citation: Selya AS. Reducing the smoking-related health burden in the USA through diversion to electronic cigarettes: a system dynamics simulation study. Harm Reduct J. 2021;18(1):36. Published 2021 Mar 20. doi:10.1186/s12954-021-00484-6
- Acknowledgement: This work was supported by the National Institute for General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) within the National Institutes of Health (NIH), grant number P20GM121341; by the Norwegian Agency for International Cooperation and Quality Enhancement in Higher Education (DIKU), grant number NNA-2016/10023. After the initial submission of this manuscript, AS became employed by Pinney Associates, Inc. which provides consulting services on tobacco harm minimization to JUUL Labs, Inc. The content presented here precedes this competing interest, and JUUL Labs, Inc. and PinneyAssociates, Inc. had any role in the conceptualization, design, analysis, interpretation, or presentation of data, nor in the decision to publish.