Michael Bloomberg: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Added content)
(Adding highlights)
Line 181: Line 181:


===2021 Apr 27 [https://theunion.org/news/mexico%E2%80%99s-national-institute-of-public-health-publishes-%E2%80%9Cends-repository%E2%80%9D MEXICO’S NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH PUBLISHES “ENDS REPOSITORY”]===
===2021 Apr 27 [https://theunion.org/news/mexico%E2%80%99s-national-institute-of-public-health-publishes-%E2%80%9Cends-repository%E2%80%9D MEXICO’S NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH PUBLISHES “ENDS REPOSITORY”]===
*With support from The Union, Mexico’s National Institute of Health conducted a systematic literature review of nearly one thousand articles published between 2017 and 2020.  
*With support from <span style="background-color: rgb(255, 204, 229);" data-mce-style="background-color: #ffff00;">The Union</span>, Mexico’s National Institute of Health conducted a systematic literature review of nearly one thousand articles published between 2017 and 2020.  
*As The Union documents in its May 2020 position paper, “[https://theunion.org/sites/default/files/2020-08/TheUnion_TobaccoControl_E-CigPaper_English_07.pdf Where Bans Are Best],” novel products, including ENDS and heated tobacco products (HTPs), threaten the World Health Organization’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Our position, which is also supported by this new evidence base, is that low- and middle-income countries must apply the precautionary principle and ban these products before they threaten to derail tobacco control progress and hook a new generation of users.
*As <span style="background-color: rgb(255, 204, 229);" data-mce-style="background-color: #ffff00;">The Union</span> documents in its May 2020 position paper, “[https://theunion.org/sites/default/files/2020-08/TheUnion_TobaccoControl_E-CigPaper_English_07.pdf Where Bans Are Best],” novel products, including ENDS and heated tobacco products (HTPs), threaten the World Health Organization’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Our position, which is also supported by this new evidence base, is that low- and middle-income countries must apply the precautionary principle and ban these products before they threaten to derail tobacco control progress and hook a new generation of users.