Nicotine - Misperceptions, Misinformation, or Disinformation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 838: | Line 838: | ||
===2023: [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-43733-3 Physical and chemical characterizations of a reference e-cigarette used in animal testing]=== | ===2023: [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-43733-3 Physical and chemical characterizations of a reference e-cigarette used in animal testing]=== | ||
*The paper calibrates and tests this equipment, showing the potential problems of exposing these biological systems when the aerosol is generated by a high powered device with sub-ohm coils and an inapprotriately low airflow. This grossly deviates from consumer usage of these divices and is also the perfect storm for generating aerosols under overheating conditions and high toxin’s load. | |||
*Many cell/rodent studies report deleterious biological effects from the exposure to e-cigarette aerosol, thus contributing to the vaping harm narrative, but often the aerosols are unrealistic, overheated and toxic. A second paper is forecoming in which we will revise 19 studies with this problem, there are bound to be much more. | |||
* Sébastien Soulet, Léa Constant & Vanille Quinty Scientific Reports volume 13, Article number: 16624 (2023) | |||
===2022: [https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11739-022-02967-1.pdf Analysis of common methodological flaws in the highest cited e‑cigarette epidemiology research]=== | ===2022: [https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11739-022-02967-1.pdf Analysis of common methodological flaws in the highest cited e‑cigarette epidemiology research]=== | ||