Nicotine - Retracted Studies, Papers, and Articles: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
*Referring to: Pierce JP, Luo M, McMenamin SB, et alDeclines in cigarette smoking among US adolescents and young adults: indications of independence from e-cigarette vaping surgeTobacco Control Published Online First: 08 November 2023. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057907 | *Referring to: Pierce JP, Luo M, McMenamin SB, et alDeclines in cigarette smoking among US adolescents and young adults: indications of independence from e-cigarette vaping surgeTobacco Control Published Online First: 08 November 2023. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057907 | ||
===2016-2020: [https://pubpeer.com/publications/E2628F04937D0DBD870E115CB41C8B E-cigarettes and smoking cessation in real-world and clinical settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis]=== | ===2016-2020: RE: [https://pubpeer.com/publications/E2628F04937D0DBD870E115CB41C8B E-cigarettes and smoking cessation in real-world and clinical settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis]=== | ||
*Multiple Comments, many linking to more information | *Multiple Comments, many linking to more information | ||
**"The most obvious issue is that the result is based on studies that have no bearing on whether e-cigarettes are effective or not. This is because vapers who successfully quit smoking were excluded and only those who failed to do so were retained. The studies were not at fault, they were just not set up to evaluate quit rates in smokers who try and not try vaping. The fault is with misinterpreting their results. The letter in LRM referenced above provides more details." (Hajek) | **"The most obvious issue is that the result is based on studies that have no bearing on whether e-cigarettes are effective or not. This is because vapers who successfully quit smoking were excluded and only those who failed to do so were retained. The studies were not at fault, they were just not set up to evaluate quit rates in smokers who try and not try vaping. The fault is with misinterpreting their results. The letter in LRM referenced above provides more details." (Hajek) | ||