Myth: Alternative nicotine products are as dangerous as smoking: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 325: | Line 325: | ||
*Overall, ENDS appear to be more implant-friendly than conventional tobacco cigarettes | *Overall, ENDS appear to be more implant-friendly than conventional tobacco cigarettes | ||
*Many of the carcinogens present in tobacco are not present in the aerosol generated by ENDS, which makes ENDS appear to be less damaging to the oral mucosa. | *Many of the carcinogens present in tobacco are not present in the aerosol generated by ENDS, which makes ENDS appear to be less damaging to the oral mucosa. | ||
*Citation: | *Citation: Zhang Q, Wen C. The risk profile of electronic nicotine delivery systems, compared to traditional cigarettes, on oral disease: a review. Front Public Health. 2023 May 15;11:1146949. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1146949. PMID: 37255760; PMCID: PMC10226679. | ||
===2023: [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00784-023-05162-4 The impact of electronic and conventional cigarettes on periodontal health—a systematic review and meta-analysis]=== | ===2023: [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00784-023-05162-4 The impact of electronic and conventional cigarettes on periodontal health—a systematic review and meta-analysis]=== | ||