Nicotine - Addiction/Dependence: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 239: | Line 239: | ||
**Citation: Houtsmuller EJ, Fant RV, Eissenberg TE, Henningfield JE, Stitzer ML. Flavor improvement does not increase abuse liability of nicotine chewing gum. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2002 Jun;72(3):559-68. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(02)00723-2. PMID: 12175452. | **Citation: Houtsmuller EJ, Fant RV, Eissenberg TE, Henningfield JE, Stitzer ML. Flavor improvement does not increase abuse liability of nicotine chewing gum. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2002 Jun;72(3):559-68. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(02)00723-2. PMID: 12175452. | ||
***Acknowledgement: This study was supported by SmithKline Beecham Consumer Healthcare. | ***Acknowledgement: This study was supported by SmithKline Beecham Consumer Healthcare. | ||
===2000 [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10823399/ A comparison of the abuse liability and dependence potential of nicotine patch, gum, spray and inhaler]=== | |||
*"We conclude that abuse liability from all four NRT products was low. Subjective dependence was moderate and did not differ across products. Behavioural dependence was modest and was positively related to rate of nicotine delivery." | |||
**Citation: West R, Hajek P, Foulds J, Nilsson F, May S, Meadows A. A comparison of the abuse liability and dependence potential of nicotine patch, gum, spray and inhaler. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2000 Apr;149(3):198-202. doi: 10.1007/s002130000382. PMID: 10823399. | |||
***Acknowledgment: This study was funded by Pharmacia and Upjohn, Sweden. | |||
='''Novel Oral Products (Chewable)'''= | ='''Novel Oral Products (Chewable)'''= | ||