Nicotine - Retracted Studies, Papers, and Articles: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(adding content) |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
*2020: [https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.119.014519 Retraction to: Electronic Cigarette Use and Myocardial Infarction Among Adults in the US Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health] | *2020: [https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.119.014519 Retraction to: Electronic Cigarette Use and Myocardial Infarction Among Adults in the US Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health] | ||
**Media - USA Today: [https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/02/20/nyu-scientists-others-call-taxpayer-funded-ucsf-vaping-study-probe/4805323002/ A study claimed vaping doubles risk for heart attacks. It's been retracted for being 'unreliable'] | **Media - USA Today: [https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/02/20/nyu-scientists-others-call-taxpayer-funded-ucsf-vaping-study-probe/4805323002/ A study claimed vaping doubles risk for heart attacks. It's been retracted for being 'unreliable'] | ||
=How Mistakes Can Happen= | |||
===2022: [https://reason.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Rodu-Plurphanswat-CrossSec-Studies-IAEM-2022.pdf Cross‑sectional e‑cigarette studies are unreliable without timing of exposure and disease diagnosis]=== | |||
*"Studies based on cross-sectional data with no information on age of e-cigarette initiation and age of diagnosis invariably overestimate associations by including cases that were diagnosed before e-cigarette exposure. Although the authors of those studies did not make causal claims in the reports, university media releases and subsequent media articles invariably misled the public to believe that e-cigarette use increases risk for diseases." | |||
*Rodu B, Plurphanswat N. Cross-sectional e-cigarette studies are unreliable without timing of exposure and disease diagnosis. Intern Emerg Med. 2023 Jan;18(1):319-323. doi: 10.1007/s11739-022-03141-3. Epub 2022 Nov 25. PMID: 36434423. | |||
=Retraction Requests by Experts= | =Retraction Requests by Experts= | ||
Revision as of 10:35, 10 January 2024
Retractions
2022: Original: Association of Smoking and E-Cigarette in Chronic Liver Disease: An NHANES Study
- 2023: Retraction Notice to “Association of Smoking and E-Cigarette in Chronic Liver Disease: An NHANES Study”
- Media - Filter: Journal Retracts Study That Linked Vaping to Liver Disease
2022: Original: Cancer Prevalence in E-Cigarette Users: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional NHANES Study
2019: Original: Electronic Cigarette Use and Myocardial Infarction Among Adults in the US Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health
How Mistakes Can Happen
2022: Cross‑sectional e‑cigarette studies are unreliable without timing of exposure and disease diagnosis
- "Studies based on cross-sectional data with no information on age of e-cigarette initiation and age of diagnosis invariably overestimate associations by including cases that were diagnosed before e-cigarette exposure. Although the authors of those studies did not make causal claims in the reports, university media releases and subsequent media articles invariably misled the public to believe that e-cigarette use increases risk for diseases."
- Rodu B, Plurphanswat N. Cross-sectional e-cigarette studies are unreliable without timing of exposure and disease diagnosis. Intern Emerg Med. 2023 Jan;18(1):319-323. doi: 10.1007/s11739-022-03141-3. Epub 2022 Nov 25. PMID: 36434423.
Retraction Requests by Experts
Expressions of Concern (By Journal Staff)
Suggestions to add to this page
