ENDS Flavors: Difference between revisions

Line 45:

=Abuse Liability - All THR Products=

===2022: [https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-022-14166-w E-cigarette addiction and harm perception: Does initiation flavor choice matter?]===

*"Traditionally flavored e-cigarette initiation produces similar risk for addiction and harm perceptions as non-traditionally flavored initiation. These findings suggest that banning non-traditional flavors alone may be ineffective in curbing e-cigarette addiction and harm perception. Additional research is needed to better understand which e-cigarette product characteristics and behaviors may be associated with greater addiction and reduced harm perceptions."

**Hung, M., Spencer, A., Hon, E.S. et al. E-cigarette addiction and harm perception: Does initiation flavor choice matter?. BMC Public Health 22, 1780 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14166-w

===2020: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33176942/ Abuse liability assessment of the JUUL system in four flavors relative to combustible cigarette, nicotine gum and a comparator electronic nicotine delivery system among adult smokers]===

Line 66:

Line 70:

*mint-flavored nicotine gum was rated as more palatable than the original nicotine gum, but the improvement in flavor did not increase abuse liability in adults (22 – 50 years old) or young adults (18 –21 years old). Since the aversive taste of the original nicotine gum was an important impediment to compliance (Rose, 1996) and treatment initiation, the availability of nicotine gum in different flavors and the development of alternative oral nicotine replacement products with appealing flavors may improve compliance and expand the range of options for those attempting to quit smoking, without posing an increased risk of abuse.

*[https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/s0091-3057(02)00723-2 PDF Version]

*Citation: Houtsmuller, E. J., Fant, R. V., Eissenberg, T. E., Henningfield, J. E., & Stitzer, M. L. (2002). Flavor improvement does not increase abuse liability of nicotine chewing gum. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 72(3), 559–568. doi:10.1016/s0091-3057(02)00723-2

=Marketing/Advertising/Packaging=

@@ Line 45: / Line 45: @@
 =Abuse Liability - All THR Products= <!--T:10-->
+===2022: [https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-022-14166-w E-cigarette addiction and harm perception: Does initiation flavor choice matter?]===
+*"Traditionally flavored e-cigarette initiation produces similar risk for addiction and harm perceptions as non-traditionally flavored initiation. These findings suggest that banning non-traditional flavors alone may be ineffective in curbing e-cigarette addiction and harm perception. Additional research is needed to better understand which e-cigarette product characteristics and behaviors may be associated with greater addiction and reduced harm perceptions."
+**Hung, M., Spencer, A., Hon, E.S. et al. E-cigarette addiction and harm perception: Does initiation flavor choice matter?. BMC Public Health 22, 1780 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14166-w
 ===2020: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33176942/ Abuse liability assessment of the JUUL system in four flavors relative to combustible cigarette, nicotine gum and a comparator electronic nicotine delivery system among adult smokers]=== <!--T:11-->
@@ Line 66: / Line 70: @@
 *mint-flavored nicotine gum was rated as more palatable than the original nicotine gum, but the improvement in flavor did not increase abuse liability in adults (22 – 50 years old) or young adults (18 –21 years old). Since the aversive taste of the original nicotine gum was an important impediment to compliance (Rose, 1996) and treatment initiation, the availability of nicotine gum in different flavors and the development of alternative oral nicotine replacement products with appealing flavors may improve compliance and expand the range of options for those attempting to quit smoking, without posing an increased risk of abuse.
 *[https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/s0091-3057(02)00723-2 PDF Version]
 *Citation: Houtsmuller, E. J., Fant, R. V., Eissenberg, T. E., Henningfield, J. E., & Stitzer, M. L. (2002). Flavor improvement does not increase abuse liability of nicotine chewing gum. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 72(3), 559–568. doi:10.1016/s0091-3057(02)00723-2
 =Marketing/Advertising/Packaging=