User talk:Phil-w888: Difference between revisions

Safer nicotine wiki Tobacco Harm Reduction
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(question)
 
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
But why would rodents be so worthy of saving? :) --[[User:Kim Petersen|'''''K'''<small>im</small>'' '''''D'''<small>abelstein</small>'' '''''P'''<small>etersen</small>]]'' <small>[[User talk:Kim Petersen|&gt;&gt;leave a comment&lt;&lt;]]</small> 23:26, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
But why would rodents be so worthy of saving? :) --[[User:Kim Petersen|'''''K'''<small>im</small>'' '''''D'''<small>abelstein</small>'' '''''P'''<small>etersen</small>]]'' <small>[[User talk:Kim Petersen|&gt;&gt;leave a comment&lt;&lt;]]</small> 23:26, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
:Literally cooking the data by torturing rodents in dry hit "research" to manufacture policy-based evidence is cruelty to animals. [[User:Phil-w888|Phil-w888]] ([[User talk:Phil-w888|talk]]) 22:05, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:06, 2 December 2020

But why would rodents be so worthy of saving? :) --Kim Dabelstein Petersen >>leave a comment<< 23:26, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Literally cooking the data by torturing rodents in dry hit "research" to manufacture policy-based evidence is cruelty to animals. Phil-w888 (talk) 22:05, 2 December 2020 (UTC)