User talk:Phil-w888: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Kim Petersen (talk | contribs) (question) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
But why would rodents be so worthy of saving? :) --[[User:Kim Petersen|'''''K'''<small>im</small>'' '''''D'''<small>abelstein</small>'' '''''P'''<small>etersen</small>]]'' <small>[[User talk:Kim Petersen|>>leave a comment<<]]</small> 23:26, 1 December 2020 (UTC) | But why would rodents be so worthy of saving? :) --[[User:Kim Petersen|'''''K'''<small>im</small>'' '''''D'''<small>abelstein</small>'' '''''P'''<small>etersen</small>]]'' <small>[[User talk:Kim Petersen|>>leave a comment<<]]</small> 23:26, 1 December 2020 (UTC) | ||
Literally cooking the data by torturing rodents in dry hit "research" to manufacture policy-based evidence is cruelty to animals.[[User:Phil-w888|Phil-w888]] ([[User talk:Phil-w888|talk]]) 22:05, 2 December 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:05, 2 December 2020
But why would rodents be so worthy of saving? :) --Kim Dabelstein Petersen >>leave a comment<< 23:26, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Literally cooking the data by torturing rodents in dry hit "research" to manufacture policy-based evidence is cruelty to animals.Phil-w888 (talk) 22:05, 2 December 2020 (UTC)