Current Impactful Studies: Difference between revisions

Current Impactful Studies (view source)

2 bytes added , 3 years ago

no edit summary

211

edits

Revision as of 16:58, 2 December 2020 (view source) Alan Beard (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Tag: Visual edit: Switched ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:59, 2 December 2020 (view source) Alan Beard (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Tag: Visual edit: Switched Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	These studies will have been recently published in the last few months, and rightly or wrongly receiving media attention. Negative media attention is by its very nature, vastly more common, as 'bad news travels or sells'. Some may be described as junk studies, but we must demonstrate why that is the the case in a Scientific logical manner,not just simply dismiss.		These studies will have been recently published in the last few months, and rightly or wrongly receiving media attention. Negative media attention is by its very nature, vastly more common, as 'bad news travels or sells'. Some may be described as junk studies, but we must demonstrate why that is the the case in a Scientific logical manner,not just simply dismiss.



	[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33220094/ Socioeconomic distribution of e-cigarette use among recent former regular smokers and current smokers at ages 25-26 in England]		[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33220094/ Socioeconomic distribution of e-cigarette use among recent former regular smokers and current smokers at ages 25-26 in England]