| Line 732: | Line 732: | ||
*Acknowledgement: This work was supported by CA-085839 to PFS | *Acknowledgement: This work was supported by CA-085839 to PFS | ||
='''Studies - Expansion | ='''Studies - Expansion/Contraction of the Alternative Nicotine Products Market vs Smoking'''= | ||
===2022: [https://www.qeios.com/read/GM2450 Higher Sales of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) in the US Are Associated with Cigarette Sales Declines, according to a Trend Break Analysis]=== | ===2022: [https://www.qeios.com/read/GM2450 Higher Sales of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) in the US Are Associated with Cigarette Sales Declines, according to a Trend Break Analysis]=== | ||
| Line 744: | Line 744: | ||
===2022: [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0091743522001116 Effect of flavored E-cigarette bans in the United States: What does the evidence show?]=== | ===2022: [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0091743522001116 Effect of flavored E-cigarette bans in the United States: What does the evidence show?]=== | ||
*However, in this paper, we propose an evidence-based version of this model based on several years' worth of longitudinal and econometric research, which suggests that youth e-cigarette use has instead worked to replace a culture of youth smoking. From this analysis, we propose a re-evaluation of current policies surrounding e-cigarette sales so that declines in e-cigarette use will not come at the cost of increasing cigarette use among youth and adults. | *However, in this paper, we propose an evidence-based version of this model based on several years' worth of longitudinal and econometric research, which suggests that youth e-cigarette use has instead worked to replace a culture of youth smoking. From this analysis, we propose a re-evaluation of current policies surrounding e-cigarette sales so that declines in e-cigarette use will not come at the cost of increasing cigarette use among youth and adults. | ||
===2022: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9287473/ Impact of existing and potential e-cigarette flavor restrictions on e-cigarette use among young adult e-cigarette users in 6 US metropolitan areas]=== | |||
*Results from this study highlight heterogeneity in young adult e-cigarette users’ reactions to existing flavored e-cigarette sales restrictions and hypothetical restrictions. Some reduced e-cigarette use, but many reported intentions to continue e-cigarette use, by using tank-based e-cigarettes, available flavors, or flavors accessed through alternative sources. More concerning, some switched to cigarettes. Similarly, in response to future restrictions of all flavored e-liquids, young adult e-cigarette users largely indicated that they would either quit vaping – the ideal scenario – or switch to cigarettes – the least desirable scenario. Another major concern highlighted was access to flavored e-cigarettes despite restrictions (e.g., online, across state lines). Collectively, findings suggest that implications of flavored e-cigarette sales restrictions are complex, with the potential for both reductions in e-cigarette use and unintended consequences among young adults, including continued use of flavored e-cigarettes or switching to cigarettes, and retail and consumer circumvention of restrictions. | |||
===2021: [https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/9/4876 US Nicotine Vaping Product SimSmoke Simulation Model: The Effect of Vaping and Tobacco Control Policies on Smoking Prevalence and Smoking-Attributable Deaths]=== | ===2021: [https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/9/4876 US Nicotine Vaping Product SimSmoke Simulation Model: The Effect of Vaping and Tobacco Control Policies on Smoking Prevalence and Smoking-Attributable Deaths]=== | ||
edits