ENDS Adults Who Smoke: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 92: Line 92:




===2021: Testimony in Netherlands pertaining to a potential flavour / flavor ban: [https://www.clivebates.com/documents/NLFlavoursResponseJan2021.pdf Regulation of e-cigarette flavours – a response]===
===2021: [https://www.clivebates.com/documents/NLFlavoursResponseJan2021.pdf Regulation of e-cigarette flavours – a response]===
*Testimony in Netherlands pertaining to a potential flavour / flavor ban. This document responds to the proposed Decree of the State Secretary for Health, Welfare and Sport on the regulation of e-cigarette flavours in the Netherlands.
*Signed by 24 experts from around the world
*Signed by 24 experts from around the world
*Covers 12 key points
*Covers 12 key points
**Sets conflicting objectives and takes a “war on drugs” approach to nicotine.
**Adopts false and misleading claims about the risks of e-cigarettes.
**Draws on irrelevant information about an outbreak of lung injuries in North America.
**Misunderstands “dual-use”.
**Asserts a “gateway effect” but there is more likely to be a diversion away from smoking.
**Takes a simplistic approach to youth risk behaviours and fails to demonstrate benefits to adolescent public health.
**Ignores perverse consequences of prohibition, even though these are foreseeable.
**Fails to show benefits for adolescents or address concerns it may cause harm to young people.
**Ignores the harmful effects of a vaping flavour (flavor) ban on adults.
**Creates regulatory protection for the cigarette trade.
**Violates important regulatory principles, including those underpinning the European Union internal market.
**Proposes an illiberal policy and fails to recognise a major global public health opportunity.
*Acknowledgement: We confirm that signatories report no conflicts with respect to FCTC Article 5.3 and no financial conflicts of interest with respect to tobacco or e-cigarette companies under the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICJME) reporting standard.




Line 228: Line 242:
*Citation: Farsalinos, K., Romagna, G., Tsiapras, D., Kyrzopoulos, S., Spyrou, A., & Voudris, V. (2013). Impact of Flavour Variability on Electronic Cigarette Use Experience: An Internet Survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(12), 7272–7282. doi:10.3390/ijerph10127272  
*Citation: Farsalinos, K., Romagna, G., Tsiapras, D., Kyrzopoulos, S., Spyrou, A., & Voudris, V. (2013). Impact of Flavour Variability on Electronic Cigarette Use Experience: An Internet Survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(12), 7272–7282. doi:10.3390/ijerph10127272  
*Acknowledgement: No funding was received for this study.
*Acknowledgement: No funding was received for this study.


=Nicotine Levels=
=Nicotine Levels=
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu