Myth: Alternative nicotine products are as dangerous as smoking: Difference between revisions

Myth: Alternative nicotine products are as dangerous as smoking (view source)

492 bytes removed , 3 months ago

5,491

edits

@@ Line 269: / Line 269: @@
 *[https://sci-hub.wf/10.1093/ntr/ntaa150 PDF]
 *Citation: Rachel N Cassidy, Jennifer W Tidey, Suzanne M Colby, Exclusive E-Cigarette Users Report Lower Levels of Respiratory Symptoms Relative to Dual E-Cigarette and Cigarette Users, Nicotine & Tobacco Research, Volume 22, Issue Supplement_1, December 2020, Pages S54–S60, https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaa150
-===2020: SACCHARIN TRANSIT TIME IN EXCLUSIVE E-CIGARETTES AND HEATED TOBACCO PRODUCTS USERS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY===
-Ex-smokers who have switched to exclusive regular use of combustion-free nicotine delivery systems (i.e. ECs/e-cigarettes and HTPs/heated tobacco products) exhibit similar saccharin transit time as never and former smokers. This suggests that combustion-free nicotine delivery technologies are unlikely to have detrimental effects on MCC (mucociliary clearance) function
 ===2020: [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2040622320961617 COPD smokers who switched to e-cigarettes: health outcomes at 5-year follow up]===