|
|
| Line 389: |
Line 389: |
| <br> | | <br> |
|
| |
|
| =Regulations and Taxes= | | =Regulations (not including taxes)= |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| Line 430: |
Line 430: |
| *[https://erj.ersjournals.com/content/erj/early/2020/02/20/13993003.00166-2020.full.pdf PDF Version] | | *[https://erj.ersjournals.com/content/erj/early/2020/02/20/13993003.00166-2020.full.pdf PDF Version] |
| *Citation: A rational approach to e-cigarettes: challenging ERS policy on tobacco harm reduction, John Britton, Jacob George, Linda Bauld, Sanjay Agrawal, John Moxham, Deborah Arnott, Ann McNeill, Nicholas S. Hopkinson - European Respiratory Journal May 2020, 55 (5) 2000166; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00166-2020 | | *Citation: A rational approach to e-cigarettes: challenging ERS policy on tobacco harm reduction, John Britton, Jacob George, Linda Bauld, Sanjay Agrawal, John Moxham, Deborah Arnott, Ann McNeill, Nicholas S. Hopkinson - European Respiratory Journal May 2020, 55 (5) 2000166; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00166-2020 |
|
| |
|
| |
| ===2020: [https://www.nber.org/papers/w26724 The Effects of E-Cigarette Taxes on E-Cigarette Prices and Tobacco Product Sales: Evidence from Retail Panel Data]===
| |
| *We simulate that for every one standard e-cigarette pod (a device that contains liquid nicotine in e-cigarettes) of 0.7 ml no longer purchased as a result of an e-cigarette tax, the same tax increases traditional cigarettes purchased by 6.2 extra packs.
| |
| *[https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w26724/w26724.pdf PDF Version]
| |
| *Citation: Cotti, C., Courtemanche, C., Maclean, J. C., Nesson, E., Pesko, M., & Tefft, N. (2020). The Effects of E-Cigarette Taxes on E-Cigarette Prices and Tobacco Product Sales: Evidence from Retail Panel Data. doi:10.3386/w26724
| |
| *Acknowledgement: Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01DA045016 (PI: Michael Pesko).
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| Line 447: |
Line 440: |
| *Citation: Carla J Berg, PhD, MBA, Dianne C Barker, MHS, Steve Sussman, PhD, Betelihem Getachew, MPH, Kim Pulvers, PhD, MPH, Theodore L Wagener, PhD, Rashelle B Hayes, PhD, Lisa Henriksen, PhD, Vape Shop Owners/Managers’ Opinions About FDA Regulation of E-Cigarettes, Nicotine & Tobacco Research, Volume 23, Issue 3, March 2021, Pages 535–542, https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaa138 | | *Citation: Carla J Berg, PhD, MBA, Dianne C Barker, MHS, Steve Sussman, PhD, Betelihem Getachew, MPH, Kim Pulvers, PhD, MPH, Theodore L Wagener, PhD, Rashelle B Hayes, PhD, Lisa Henriksen, PhD, Vape Shop Owners/Managers’ Opinions About FDA Regulation of E-Cigarettes, Nicotine & Tobacco Research, Volume 23, Issue 3, March 2021, Pages 535–542, https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaa138 |
| *Acknowledgement: This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute (R01CA215155-01A1; PI: Berg). | | *Acknowledgement: This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute (R01CA215155-01A1; PI: Berg). |
|
| |
|
| |
| ===2019: [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3503054 2019: E-Cigarettes and Adult Smoking: Evidence from Minnesota]===
| |
| *We provide some of the first evidence on how e-cigarette taxes impact adult smokers, exploiting the large tax increase in Minnesota. That state was the first to impose a tax on e-cigarettes by extending the definition of tobacco products to include e-cigarettes. This tax, which is 95% of the wholesale price, provides a plausibly exogenous deterrent to e-cigarette use.
| |
| *Our results suggest that in the sample period about 32,400 additional adult smokers would have quit smoking in Minnesota in the absence of the tax. If this tax were imposed on a national level about 1.8 million smokers would be deterred from quitting in a ten year period. The taxation of e-cigarettes at the same rate as cigarettes could deter more than 2.75 million smokers nationally from quitting in the same period.
| |
| *[https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID3503054_code35407.pdf?abstractid=3503054&mirid=1&type=2 PDF Version]
| |
| *Citation: Saffer, Henry and Grossman, Michael and Dench, Daniel and Dave, Dhaval, E-Cigarettes and Adult Smoking: Evidence from Minnesota (December 12, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3503054 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3503054
| |
| *Acknowledgement: This project was funded by grant number R01-DA039968 entitled “The Economics of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: Advertising and Outcomes”, from the National Institute of Health to the National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. This study employs data from the A.C. Nielsen Company, which was purchased from the Kilts Center of the University of the Chicago Booth School of Business.
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| ===2019: [https://www.nber.org/papers/w26126 The Effect of E-Cigarette Taxes on Pre-pregnancy and Prenatal Smoking]===
| |
| *We show that e-cigarette taxes increase pre-pregnancy smoking, increase prenatal smoking, and lower smoking cessation during pregnancy. These findings imply that e-cigarettes and traditional cigarettes are substitutes among pregnant women.
| |
| * [https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w26126/revisions/w26126.rev0.pdf PDF Version]
| |
| *Citation: The Effect of E-Cigarette Taxes on Pre-Pregnancy and Prenatal Smoking, and Birth Outcomes - Rahi Abouk, Scott Adams, Bo Feng, Johanna Catherine Maclean, and Michael F. Pesko, NBER Working Paper No. 26126, July 2019, JEL No. I12
| |
| *Acknowledgements: Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01DA045016 (PI: Michael Pesko).
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| Line 506: |
Line 484: |
| *Citation: Hall, W., Gartner, C., & Forlini, C. (2015). Ethical issues raised by a ban on the sale of electronic nicotine devices. Addiction, 110(7), 1061–1067. doi:10.1111/add.12898 | | *Citation: Hall, W., Gartner, C., & Forlini, C. (2015). Ethical issues raised by a ban on the sale of electronic nicotine devices. Addiction, 110(7), 1061–1067. doi:10.1111/add.12898 |
| *Acknowledgement: C.G. is supported by an NHMRC Career Development Award. C.F. is supported by funding from the Australia Research Council for research on the use of stimulant drugs as cognitive enhancers. We would like to thank Sarah Yeates for her assistance in preparing this paper for publication. | | *Acknowledgement: C.G. is supported by an NHMRC Career Development Award. C.F. is supported by funding from the Australia Research Council for research on the use of stimulant drugs as cognitive enhancers. We would like to thank Sarah Yeates for her assistance in preparing this paper for publication. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | =Taxes= |
| | |
| | |
| | '''See this page: [https://safernicotine.wiki/mediawiki/index.php/ENDS_Taxes#2004:_Poor_Smokers.2C_Poor_Quitters.2C_and_Cigarette_Tax_Regressivity ENDS Taxes] for studies, articles, news, videos, etc. about taxing vapor products.''' |
| <br> | | <br> |
| <br> | | <br> |