|
|
Line 231: |
Line 231: |
| =2nd Hand Vapor= <!--T:56--> | | =2nd Hand Vapor= <!--T:56--> |
|
| |
|
| | |
| | ===2022: [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11739-022-03061-2 Computational modeling method to estimate secondhand exposure potential from exhalations during e-vapor product use under various real-world scenarios]=== |
| | *Acetaldehyde and acrolein were not detectable after use of any of the test products. |
| | *When these data were used as inputs to a computational room air level and non-user intake model, the ambient concentrations of exhaled nicotine and formaldehyde predicted that non-user intakes were substantially reduced for test product use compared to conventional cigarette use. |
| | *Collectively, the results predict that room air levels and exposure of the selected analytes to non-users were relatively low and several-fold below regulatory PELs and AIHA limit under the modeled space and use conditions. |
| | *...room air levels of nicotine, formaldehyde, acrolein, and acetaldehyde levels were significantly below OSHA PELs or American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) limit... |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
Line 273: |
Line 279: |
| Non-cancer risk analysis revealed “No Significant Risk” of harm to human health for vapor samples from e-liquids. | | Non-cancer risk analysis revealed “No Significant Risk” of harm to human health for vapor samples from e-liquids. |
| With regard to cancer risk analysis, no vapor sample from e-liquids exceeded the risk limit for either children or adults. | | With regard to cancer risk analysis, no vapor sample from e-liquids exceeded the risk limit for either children or adults. |
| | | <br> |
| | |
|
| |
|
| =PAGE EDITORS - Please add Studies, Surveys, Papers in this format to keep page organized= <!--T:67--> | | =PAGE EDITORS - Please add Studies, Surveys, Papers in this format to keep page organized= <!--T:67--> |