Funded Watchdogs and Counters: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (light cleanup) |
Alan Beard (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The [https://tobaccotactics.org/ University of Bath Tobacco Control Group] has been discussed elsewhere. It has recently received a further boost in funding from Bloomberg Philanthropies to fulfill a [https://exposetobacco.org/about/ STOP] campaign to the tune of $20 million. This was to enhance the self-appointed role that the University of Bath Tobacco Control group had established as Watchdog for the Tobacco Industry. | The [https://tobaccotactics.org/ University of Bath Tobacco Control Group] has been discussed elsewhere. It has recently received a further boost in funding from Bloomberg Philanthropies to fulfill a [https://exposetobacco.org/about/ STOP] campaign to the tune of $20 million. This was to enhance the self-appointed role that the University of Bath Tobacco Control group had established as Watchdog for the Tobacco Industry. | ||
The exact opposite in terms of funding and content is [https://www.tctactics.org/index.php?title=Main_Page Tobacco Control Tactics] who challenge the findings and rationale of the other group. | The exact opposite in terms of funding and content is [https://www.tctactics.org/index.php?title=Main_Page Tobacco Control Tactics] who challenge the findings and rationale of the other group. One particular perceptive and telling quotation from that entry is contained here | ||