Myth Busting: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Added to a category)
(adding content)
Line 3: Line 3:


=ENDS - COVID / EVALI / Respiratory Disease=
=ENDS - COVID / EVALI / Respiratory Disease=
===2020: [https://rodutobaccotruth.blogspot.com/2020/07/e-cigarettes-and-respiratory-disease-no.html E-Cigarettes and Respiratory Disease: NO EVIDENCE]===
*See Also: ENDS - Popcorn Lung below


==2020: [https://rodutobaccotruth.blogspot.com/2020/07/e-cigarettes-and-respiratory-disease-no.html E-Cigarettes and Respiratory Disease: NO EVIDENCE]==
* The re-analysis by Kenkel and colleagues should prompt the American Journal of Preventive Medicine’s editors to revisit their decision to publish Bhatta and Glantz’s latest study.
* The re-analysis by Kenkel and colleagues should prompt the American Journal of Preventive Medicine’s editors to revisit their decision to publish Bhatta and Glantz’s latest study.
* Cornell University researchers, led by economics professor Don Kenkel, have published a comprehensive re-analysis of the study "Association of E-Cigarette Use With Respiratory Disease Among Adults: A Longitudinal Analysis", concluding: “We find no evidence that current or former e-cigarette use is associated with respiratory disease.” Their paper on the topic: [https://www.nber.org/papers/w27507 E-Cigarettes and Respiratory Disease: A Replication, Extension, and Future Directions]
* Cornell University researchers, led by economics professor Don Kenkel, have published a comprehensive re-analysis of the study "Association of E-Cigarette Use With Respiratory Disease Among Adults: A Longitudinal Analysis", concluding: “We find no evidence that current or former e-cigarette use is associated with respiratory disease.” Their paper on the topic: [https://www.nber.org/papers/w27507 E-Cigarettes and Respiratory Disease: A Replication, Extension, and Future Directions]
* Debunking this study: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31859175/ Association of E-Cigarette Use With Respiratory Disease Among Adults: A Longitudinal Analysis]
* Debunking this study: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31859175/ Association of E-Cigarette Use With Respiratory Disease Among Adults: A Longitudinal Analysis]
* Debunking this press release: [https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2019/12/416216/e-cigarettes-significantly-raise-risk-chronic-lung-disease-first-long-term E-Cigarettes Significantly Raise Risk of Chronic Lung Disease, First Long-Term Study Finds]
* Debunking this press release: [https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2019/12/416216/e-cigarettes-significantly-raise-risk-chronic-lung-disease-first-long-term E-Cigarettes Significantly Raise Risk of Chronic Lung Disease, First Long-Term Study Finds]
===2016: [https://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2016/11/new-study-on-e-cigarettes-and.html?fbclid=IwAR3wwIT74ldCRhb-VUVCfWjUPQkX9FJjSzW6vtbBlHxaUsvPY4qDxxHzWHw New Study on E-Cigarettes and Bronchitis: An Example of Scientific Dishonesty and Deception]===


==2016: [https://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2016/11/new-study-on-e-cigarettes-and.html?fbclid=IwAR3wwIT74ldCRhb-VUVCfWjUPQkX9FJjSzW6vtbBlHxaUsvPY4qDxxHzWHw New Study on E-Cigarettes and Bronchitis: An Example of Scientific Dishonesty and Deception]==
* The rest of the story is that essentially what we have here is an example of scientific dishonesty and apparently intentional deception of the journal readers and the public. For a movement that has devoted so much attention to attacking the tobacco industry for its deception and scientific dishonesty, I believe that we need to adhere to the highest standards of honesty and transparency in our scientific reporting. This is not happening in our reporting of the health effects of vaping, and it is certainly not happening in this study and the dissemination of its results.
* The rest of the story is that essentially what we have here is an example of scientific dishonesty and apparently intentional deception of the journal readers and the public. For a movement that has devoted so much attention to attacking the tobacco industry for its deception and scientific dishonesty, I believe that we need to adhere to the highest standards of honesty and transparency in our scientific reporting. This is not happening in our reporting of the health effects of vaping, and it is certainly not happening in this study and the dissemination of its results.
* Debunking the Abstract of: [https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1164/rccm.201604-0804OC Electronic Cigarette Use and Respiratory Symptoms in Adolescents]
* Debunking the Abstract of: [https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1164/rccm.201604-0804OC Electronic Cigarette Use and Respiratory Symptoms in Adolescents]
* Debunking this Press Release: [https://www.news-medical.net/news/20161116/E-cigarette-use-linked-to-risk-of-respiratory-symptoms-among-adolescents.aspx E-cigarette use linked to risk of respiratory symptoms among adolescents]
* Debunking this Press Release: [https://www.news-medical.net/news/20161116/E-cigarette-use-linked-to-risk-of-respiratory-symptoms-among-adolescents.aspx E-cigarette use linked to risk of respiratory symptoms among adolescents]


== 2020 [https://www.athra.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Vaping-fact-sheet-FINAL.pdf E-cigarette and vaping fact sheet]==
=ENDS - Exhaled breath (e.g. secondhand vapour)=
=== [https://www.athra.org.au/blog/2020/09/17/lung-foundation-australia-continues-to-mislead-the-public-about-vaping/ Lung Foundation Australia continues to mislead the public about vaping]===
 
==2015 [http://www.ecigarette-research.org/research/index.php/whats-new/whatsnew-2015/226-sp New study proves there is no second-hand vaping: e-cigarette aerosol contains less volatile compounds than normal exhaled breath]==


== 2015 [http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2015/12/new-study-finds-that-average-diacetyl.html New Study Finds that Average Diacetyl Exposure from Vaping is 750 Times Lower than from Smoking]==


=ENDS - Formaldehyde=
=ENDS - Formaldehyde=
== 2017 [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0278691517305033 E-cigarettes emit very high formaldehyde levels only in conditions that are aversive to users: A replication study under verified realistic use conditions]==


=ENDS - Exhaled breath (e.g. secondhand vapour)=
==2017: [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0278691517305033 E-cigarettes emit very high formaldehyde levels only in conditions that are aversive to users: A replication study under verified realistic use conditions]==
*In realistic conditions, formaldehyde in e-cigarettes is lower than cigarette smoke.
*High levels of formaldehyde in e-cigarettes are produced in unrealistic (dry puff) conditions and should be avoided in the laboratory setting.


==2015 [http://www.ecigarette-research.org/research/index.php/whats-new/whatsnew-2015/226-sp New study proves there is no second-hand vaping: e-cigarette aerosol contains less volatile compounds than normal exhaled breath]==


=ENDS - Oral Health=
=ENDS - Oral Health=
Line 86: Line 87:


=ENDS - Multiple Myths=
=ENDS - Multiple Myths=
==2020: [https://publichealthmatters.blog.gov.uk/2020/03/05/8-things-to-know-about-e-cigarettes/ 8 Things to know about Ecigaretes]==
==2020: [https://publichealthmatters.blog.gov.uk/2020/03/05/8-things-to-know-about-e-cigarettes/ 8 Things to know about Ecigaretes]==
* 8 Things that you should know, Covers myths around EVALI etc.  
* 8 Things that you should know, Covers myths around EVALI etc.  
* Not surprisingly, there are lots of inaccuracies and misconceptions about e-cigarettes and vaping. This blog looks at some of the most common myths and provides the facts.


* Not surprisingly, there are lots of inaccuracies and misconceptions about e-cigarettes and vaping. This blog looks at some of the most common myths and provides the facts.
==2020: [https://www.clivebates.com/vaping-is-sill-at-least-95-lower-risk-than-smoking-debunking-a-feeble-and-empty-critique/?fbclid=IwAR2rSh-_izT_lJVKi7OcCYL-QMNSDXwj44wVhcLtWUEh7ESnJHjcBGHU7x8 Vapingis still at least 95% lower risk than smoking - debunking a feeble and empty critique]==


== 2020 [https://www.clivebates.com/vaping-is-sill-at-least-95-lower-risk-than-smoking-debunking-a-feeble-and-empty-critique/?fbclid=IwAR2rSh-_izT_lJVKi7OcCYL-QMNSDXwj44wVhcLtWUEh7ESnJHjcBGHU7x8 Vapingis still at least 95% lower risk than smoking - debunking a feeble and empty critique]==
==2020: [https://www.athra.org.au/blog/2020/09/17/lung-foundation-australia-continues-to-mislead-the-public-about-vaping/ Lung Foundation Australia continues to mislead the public about vaping]==


== 2020 [https://voxeu.org/article/research-claims-link-between-e-cigarettes-and-respiratory-disease-not-so-fast https://voxeu.org/article/research-claims-link-between-e-cigarettes-and-respiratory-disease-not-so-fast]==
==2020: [https://voxeu.org/article/research-claims-link-between-e-cigarettes-and-respiratory-disease-not-so-fast https://voxeu.org/article/research-claims-link-between-e-cigarettes-and-respiratory-disease-not-so-fast]==


== 2020 [https://www.smokefreeworld.org/new-research-questions-link-between-e-cigarettes-and-respiratory-disease/ https://www.smokefreeworld.org/new-research-questions-link-between-e-cigarettes-and-respiratory-disease/]==
== 2020 [https://www.smokefreeworld.org/new-research-questions-link-between-e-cigarettes-and-respiratory-disease/ https://www.smokefreeworld.org/new-research-questions-link-between-e-cigarettes-and-respiratory-disease/]==
Line 123: Line 125:
=ENDS - Popcorn Lung=  
=ENDS - Popcorn Lung=  


===Cancer Research UK: [https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/causes-of-cancer/does-vaping-cause-popcorn-lung Does vaping cause popcorn lung?]===
==2019: Cancer Research UK: [https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/causes-of-cancer/does-vaping-cause-popcorn-lung Does vaping cause popcorn lung?]==
 
* No. There’s no good evidence that e-cigarettes could cause the lung condition called popcorn lung. There’s been no confirmed cases of popcorn lung reported in people who use e-cigarettes.
* No. There’s no good evidence that e-cigarettes could cause the lung condition called popcorn lung. There’s been no confirmed cases of popcorn lung reported in people who use e-cigarettes.


===[https://www.cmaj.ca/content/re-vape-related-popcorn-lung-debunked-years-ago RE: Vape related "Popcorn Lung" debunked years ago]===
==2019: [https://www.cmaj.ca/content/re-vape-related-popcorn-lung-debunked-years-ago RE: Vape related "Popcorn Lung" debunked years ago]==
* There is 750x more diacetyl in a pack of cigarettes than there is in a days worth of vaping nicotine fluid, and to date we have no confirmation that smokers are getting popcorn lung.


* There is 750x more diacetyl in a pack of cigarettes than there is in a days worth of vaping nicotine fluid, and to date we have no confirmation that smokers are getting popcorn lung.
==:2015 [http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2015/12/new-study-finds-that-average-diacetyl.html New Study Finds that Average Diacetyl Exposure from Vaping is 750 Times Lower than from Smoking]==
*There's just one minor fact that is omitted completely in the article, as well as in all the media coverage.
*That fact: All conventional cigarettes produce tobacco smoke that contains diacetyl, and the levels of diacetyl in cigarettes are a lot higher than those produced by e-cigarettes.


=THR - Articles=
=THR - Articles=