ENDS Respiratory System: Difference between revisions

Line 231:

=2nd Hand Vapor=

===2022: [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11739-022-03061-2 Computational modeling method to estimate secondhand exposure potential from exhalations during e-vapor product use under various real-world scenarios]===

*Acetaldehyde and acrolein were not detectable after use of any of the test products.

*When these data were used as inputs to a computational room air level and non-user intake model, the ambient concentrations of exhaled nicotine and formaldehyde predicted that non-user intakes were substantially reduced for test product use compared to conventional cigarette use.

*Collectively, the results predict that room air levels and exposure of the selected analytes to non-users were relatively low and several-fold below regulatory PELs and AIHA limit under the modeled space and use conditions.

*...room air levels of nicotine, formaldehyde, acrolein, and acetaldehyde levels were significantly below OSHA PELs or American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) limit...

Line 273:

Line 279:

Non-cancer risk analysis revealed “No Significant Risk” of harm to human health for vapor samples from e-liquids.

With regard to cancer risk analysis, no vapor sample from e-liquids exceeded the risk limit for either children or adults.

<br>

=PAGE EDITORS - Please add Studies, Surveys, Papers in this format to keep page organized=

@@ Line 231: / Line 231: @@
 =2nd Hand Vapor= <!--T:56-->
+===2022: [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11739-022-03061-2 Computational modeling method to estimate secondhand exposure potential from exhalations during e-vapor product use under various real-world scenarios]===
+*Acetaldehyde and acrolein were not detectable after use of any of the test products.
+*When these data were used as inputs to a computational room air level and non-user intake model, the ambient concentrations of exhaled nicotine and formaldehyde predicted that non-user intakes were substantially reduced for test product use compared to conventional cigarette use.
+*Collectively, the results predict that room air levels and exposure of the selected analytes to non-users were relatively low and several-fold below regulatory PELs and AIHA limit under the modeled space and use conditions.
+*...room air levels of nicotine, formaldehyde, acrolein, and acetaldehyde levels were significantly below OSHA PELs or American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) limit...
@@ Line 273: / Line 279: @@
 Non-cancer risk analysis revealed “No Significant Risk” of harm to human health for vapor samples from e-liquids.
 With regard to cancer risk analysis, no vapor sample from e-liquids exceeded the risk limit for either children or adults.
+<br>
 =PAGE EDITORS - Please add Studies, Surveys, Papers in this format to keep page organized= <!--T:67-->