Master settlement and Taxation

Safer nicotine wiki Tobacco Harm Reduction
Revision as of 13:51, 31 December 2020 by Richardpruen (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Lots of detailed explanations exist. Some very highly technical, we shall try to include the most readily understood to commence this entry


General Commentary and Background


Up in Smoke

  • "In November 1998, forty-six US states, along with the District of Columbia and five US territories, and the major tobacco companies entered into a contract of an extraordinary nature. (The other four states, Florida, Minnesota, Mississippi, and Texas, had entered similar agreements on their own beginning the year before.) The agreement, known as the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA), represented the culmination of a decades-long argument between the tobacco companies and state governments"

GSTHR

  • "The new nicotine products have been disruptive to the tobacco industry which has had to adapt or get left behind in a burgeoning market. The development of SNP has also been hugely disruptive to the deeply embedded narrative of anti-smoking campaigners. The growing use of SNP and the re-evaluation of the relative benefits of smokeless tobacco has split the global public health community. It has generated a new era of uncertainty and confusion around nicotine consumption. The long-standing ‘heroes and villains’ narrative has been disrupted to the extent that – regarding THR – some major ‘heroes’ of the tobacco wars are now public health ‘villains’ who are putting smokers’ lives at risk."


Where Did It All Go


Lost Tobacco Revenue